Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (2026)

Bankruptcy; exemptions from property of estate; exception; exempt property sold, damaged, destroyed, or acquired for public use; amounts adjusted by state treasurer; definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.5451 Bankruptcy; exemptions from property of estate; exception; exempt property sold, damaged, destroyed, or acquired for public use; amounts adjusted by state treasurer; definitions.

Sec. 5451.

    (1) A debtor in bankruptcy under the bankruptcy code, 11 USC 101 to 1532, may exempt from property of the estate property that is exempt under federal law or, under 11 USC 522(b)(2), the following property:

    (a) All of the following:

    (i) Family pictures.

    (ii) Arms and accoutrements required by law to be kept by a person.

    (iii) Wearing apparel, excluding furs.

    (iv) Cemeteries, tombs, and rights of burial in use as repositories for the dead of the debtor's family or kept for burial of the debtor.

    (v) Professionally prescribed health aids.

    (b) Provisions and fuel for comfortable subsistence of each householder and his or her family for 6 months.

    (c) The interest, not to exceed a value of $450.00 in each item and an aggregate value of $3,000.00, in household goods, furniture, utensils, books, appliances, and jewelry.

    (d) The interest, not to exceed $500.00 in value, in a seat, pew, or slip occupied by the debtor or the debtor's family in a house or place of public worship.

    (e) The interest, not to exceed $2,000.00 in value, in crops, farm animals, and feed for the farm animals.

    (f) The interest, not to exceed $500.00 in value, in household pets.

    (g) The interest, not to exceed $2,775.00 in value, in 1 motor vehicle.

    (h) The interest, not to exceed $500.00 in value, in 1 computer and its accessories.

    (i) The interest, not to exceed $2,000.00 in value, in the tools, implements, materials, stock, apparatus, or other things to enable a person to carry on the profession, trade, occupation, or business in which the person is principally engaged.

    (j) Money or other benefits paid, provided, allowed to be paid or provided, or allowed, by a stock or mutual life, health, or casualty insurance company because of the disability due to injury or sickness of an insured person, whether the debt or liability of the insured person or beneficiary was incurred before or after the accrual of benefits under the insurance policy or contract, except that this exemption does not apply to actions to recover for necessities contracted for after the accrual of the benefits.

    (k) All individual retirement accounts, including Roth IRAs, or individual retirement annuities as defined in section 408 or 408a of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 408 and 408a, and the payments or distributions from those accounts or annuities. This exemption applies to the operation of the federal bankruptcy code as permitted by section 522(b)(2) of the bankruptcy code, 11 USC 522. This exemption does not apply to the amount contributed to an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity within 120 days before the debtor files for bankruptcy. This exemption does not apply to any of the following:

    (i) The portion of an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity that is subject to an order of a court pursuant to a judgment of divorce or separate maintenance.

    (ii) The portion of an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity that is subject to an order of a court concerning child support.

    (iii) The portion of an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity that is attributable to contributions to the individual retirement account or premiums on the individual retirement annuity, including the earnings or benefits from those contributions or premiums, that, in the tax year made or paid, exceeded the deductible amount allowed under section 408 of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 408. This limitation on contributions does not apply to a rollover of a pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus plan, or other plan that is qualified under section 401 of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 401, or an annuity contract under section 403(b) of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 403.

    (l) The right or interest of a person in a pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, or other plan that is qualified under section 401 of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 401, or an annuity contract under section 403(b) of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 403, if the plan or annuity is subject to the employee retirement income security act of 1974, Public Law 93-406, 88 Stat. 829. This exemption does not apply to any amount contributed to a pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, or other qualified plan or a 403(b) annuity if the contribution occurs within 120 days before the debtor files for bankruptcy. This exemption does not apply to the right or interest of a person in a pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, or other qualified plan or a 403(b) annuity to the extent that the right or interest is subject to either of the following:

    (i) An order of a court pursuant to a judgment of divorce or separate maintenance.

    (ii) An order of a court concerning child support.

    (m) The interest of the debtor, the codebtor, if any, and the debtor's dependents, not to exceed $30,000.00 in value or, if the debtor or a dependent of the debtor at the time of the filing of the bankruptcy petition is 65 years of age or older or disabled, not to exceed $45,000.00 in value, in a homestead.

    (n) Property described in section 1 of 1927 PA 212, MCL 557.151, or real property, held jointly by a husband and wife as a tenancy by the entirety, except that this exemption does not apply with regard to a claim based on a joint debt of the husband and wife.

    (o) If the owner of a homestead dies, leaving a surviving spouse but no children, the surviving spouse before his or her remarriage, unless the surviving spouse is the owner of a homestead in his or her own right, may exempt the homestead and the rents and profits of the homestead.

    (2) An exemption under this section does not apply to a mortgage, lien, or security interest in the exempt property that is consensually given or lawfully obtained unless the lien is obtained by judgment, attachment, levy, or similar legal process in connection with a court action or proceeding against the debtor.

    (3) If property that is exempt under this section is sold, damaged, destroyed, or acquired for public use, the right to receive proceeds or, if the owner receives proceeds and holds them in a manner that makes them identifiable as proceeds, the proceeds received are exempt from the property of a federal bankruptcy estate in the same manner and amount as the exempt property. An exemption under this subsection may be claimed up to 1 year after the receipt of the proceeds by the owner.

    (4) On March 1, 2005 and at the end of each 3-year period after 2005, the state treasurer shall adjust each dollar amount in this section or, for each adjustment after March 1, 2005, each adjusted amount, by an amount determined by the state treasurer to reflect the cumulative change in the consumer price index for the 3-year period ending on the December 31 preceding the adjustment date and rounded to the nearest $25.00. The state treasurer shall publish the adjusted amounts. The adjusted amounts apply to cases filed on or after April 1 following the adjustment date.

    (5) As used in this section:

    (a) "Consumer price index" means the consumer price index for all urban consumers in the area of Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, Michigan, published by the United States department of labor or, if the United States department of labor ceases publishing that index, the most similar index available.

    (b) "Disabled" means unable to engage in substantial gainful activity, as defined by 42 USC 1382c(a)(3)(E), as a result of a physical or mental impairment and receiving supplemental security income under 42 USC 1382c(a)(3)(A) and (C).

    (c) "Proceeds" means money payable or paid as a result of 1 or more of the following:

    (i) Sale of the property.

    (ii) Insurance or other indemnification for damage or destruction of the property.

    (iii) Compensation for the acquisition for public use of the property.

    (d) "Homestead" means 1 of the following owned or being purchased under an executory contract by the debtor that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor occupies as his or her principal residence:

    (i) If the land is located outside of a recorded plat, city, or village, a residential dwelling and appurtenances and the land on which they are situated, not exceeding 40 acres.

    (ii) If the land is located within a recorded plat, city, or village, a residential dwelling and appurtenances and the land on which they are situated, not exceeding 1 lot or parcel.

    (iii) A residential dwelling situated on land not owned by the debtor.

    (iv) A condominium unit.

    (v) A unit in a cooperative.

    (vi) A motor home.

    (vii) A boat or other watercraft.

    (e) "Residential dwelling" includes, but is not limited to, a house or a manufactured or mobile home.

History: Add. 2004, Act 575, Imd. Eff. Jan. 3, 2005 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 451, Eff. Dec. 31, 2012

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: In Re Alan Wayne Raynard, 327 B.R. 623 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2005).
In Re Alan Wayne Raynard, 327 B.R. 623 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2005). · cites it 36× “Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(o). ■This exemption is available to the Ray-nards because the Raynards filed their petition on January 13, 2005, ten days after the new legislation became effective.”
In Re Wallace, 347 B.R. 626 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2006). · cites it 28× “The basis for her claimed exemption is Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(n). See also, 11 U.”
Holley v. Corcoran (In Re Holley), 661 F. App'x 391 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 11× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(o) (2006).”
In Re Pontius, 421 B.R. 814 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2009). · cites it 24× “The Debtor relies upon Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), 2 which reads as follows: Sec.”
Vinson v. Dakmak, 347 B.R. 620 (E.D. Mich. 2006). · cites it 39× “This is an appeal from the final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on January 26, 2006, denying Debtors their claimed homestead exemption taken under Michigan’s bankruptcy-exemption statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), finding that exemption to be in conflict…”
In re Sharkey, 563 B.R. 655 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2017). · cites it 15× “§ 522 (b)(3) and the Michigan exemption statute applicable to bankruptcy debtors, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 . After the Court allowed this, Debtors filed their fourth and fifth amended claims of exemption, each of which claimed exemptions under the state law exemption…”
In Re Jones, 428 B.R. 720 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2010). · cites it 22× “§ 600.5451 on Schedule C. Their respective bankruptcy trustees (the “Trustees”) each filed independent objections to the claimed exemptions, 1 arguing that M.”
In Re Lindstrom, 331 B.R. 267 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2005). · cites it 18× “On Schedule C, the Debtors cited to Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n) as the law entitling them to take this exemption.”
Richardson v. Schafer (In Re Schafer), 455 B.R. 590 (6th Cir. BAP 2011). · cites it 12× “The bankruptcy court held that Michigan’s bankruptcy-specific exemption statute ( Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 ) is constitutional under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, art.”
In re Mickens, 575 B.R. 797 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2017). · cites it 7× “As a result, the Trustee objected to the Debtors claiming the Property as exempt under the Michigan entireties exemption, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(n). The Trustee also filed an adversary proceeding seeking to avoid the transfer as a fraudulent transfer under § 548(a)(1)…”
Richardson v. Schafer (In Re Schafer), 689 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “They argue that the interpretation given to the phrase “uniform Laws” by both the Supreme Court and this Court permits states to act in the arena of bankruptcy exemptions even if they do so by making certain exemptions available only to debtors in bankruptcy, and that such…”
In Re Reinhart, 460 B.R. 466 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2011). · cites it 20× “§ 522 (b)(3) and claimed property exempt under MCL § 600.5451, which is Michigan’s bankruptcy-specific exemption statute.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1) — 8 cases
In Re Brown, 375 B.R. 362 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2007).
In Re Pontius, 421 B.R. 814 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2009). “The Debtor relies upon Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), 2 which reads as follows: Sec.”
Vinson v. Dakmak, 347 B.R. 620 (E.D. Mich. 2006). “This is an appeal from the final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on January 26, 2006, denying Debtors their claimed homestead exemption taken under Michigan’s bankruptcy-exemption statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), finding that exemption to be in conflict…”
Joseph Jack Minc & Karen Esther Minc (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2025).
Shapiro v. Sassak, 426 B.R. 680 (E.D. Mich. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(a) — 1 case
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(b) — 4 cases
Richardson (E.D. Mich. 2022).
Marc K. Thibaudeau (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2019).
Joseph Jack Minc & Karen Esther Minc (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2025).
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(c) — 1 case
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(d) — 1 case
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(e) — 1 case
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(f) — 1 case
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(g) — 2 cases
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
Joseph Jack Minc & Karen Esther Minc (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(h) — 1 case
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(i) — 2 cases
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
Marc K. Thibaudeau (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2019).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(j) — 4 cases
Richardson (E.D. Mich. 2022).
Joseph Jack Minc & Karen Esther Minc (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2025).
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
Marc K. Thibaudeau (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2019).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(k) — 2 cases
Kevin Michael Majeski (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2023).
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(l) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(m) — 3 cases
Hagan v. Mickens, 589 B.R. 594 (W.D. Mich. 2018).
United States v. Kelly (E.D. Mich. 2023).
Joseph Jack Minc & Karen Esther Minc (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(n) — 7 cases
Vinson v. Dakmak, 347 B.R. 620 (E.D. Mich. 2006). “This is an appeal from the final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on January 26, 2006, denying Debtors their claimed homestead exemption taken under Michigan’s bankruptcy-exemption statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), finding that exemption to be in conflict…”
In Re Jones, 428 B.R. 720 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2010). “§ 600.5451 on Schedule C. Their respective bankruptcy trustees (the “Trustees”) each filed independent objections to the claimed exemptions, 1 arguing that M.”
Hagan v. Mickens, 589 B.R. 594 (W.D. Mich. 2018).
Jason Robert Wylie & Leah S. Wylie (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2021).
In Re Vinson, 337 B.R. 147 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2006).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(1)(o) — 4 cases
Vinson v. Dakmak, 347 B.R. 620 (E.D. Mich. 2006). “This is an appeal from the final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on January 26, 2006, denying Debtors their claimed homestead exemption taken under Michigan’s bankruptcy-exemption statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), finding that exemption to be in conflict…”
Corcoran v. Holley (In re Holley), 594 B.R. 872 (E.D. Mich. 2018).
Shapiro v. Sassak, 426 B.R. 680 (E.D. Mich. 2010).
Holley (E.D. Mich. 2020).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(2) — 1 case
In Re Johnson, 439 B.R. 416 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(3) — 1 case
Joseph Jack Minc & Karen Esther Minc (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2025).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(5)(d) — 1 case
In Re Trofatter, 424 B.R. 247 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(l) — 1 case
Vinson v. Dakmak, 347 B.R. 620 (E.D. Mich. 2006). “This is an appeal from the final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on January 26, 2006, denying Debtors their claimed homestead exemption taken under Michigan’s bankruptcy-exemption statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), finding that exemption to be in conflict…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(l)(k) — 1 case
In re Sharkey, 563 B.R. 655 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2017). “§ 522 (b)(3) and the Michigan exemption statute applicable to bankruptcy debtors, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 . After the Court allowed this, Debtors filed their fourth and fifth amended claims of exemption, each of which claimed exemptions under the state law exemption…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(l)(n) — 7 cases
Vinson v. Dakmak, 347 B.R. 620 (E.D. Mich. 2006). “This is an appeal from the final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on January 26, 2006, denying Debtors their claimed homestead exemption taken under Michigan’s bankruptcy-exemption statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), finding that exemption to be in conflict…”
In Re Alan Wayne Raynard, 327 B.R. 623 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2005). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(o). ■This exemption is available to the Ray-nards because the Raynards filed their petition on January 13, 2005, ten days after the new legislation became effective.”
In Re Jones, 428 B.R. 720 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2010). “§ 600.5451 on Schedule C. Their respective bankruptcy trustees (the “Trustees”) each filed independent objections to the claimed exemptions, 1 arguing that M.”
In re Mickens, 575 B.R. 797 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2017). “As a result, the Trustee objected to the Debtors claiming the Property as exempt under the Michigan entireties exemption, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(n). The Trustee also filed an adversary proceeding seeking to avoid the transfer as a fraudulent transfer under § 548(a)(1)…”
In Re Pontius, 421 B.R. 814 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2009). “The Debtor relies upon Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 600.5451 (l)(n), 2 which reads as follows: Sec.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(l)(o) — 4 cases
Nino v. Moyer, 437 B.R. 230 (W.D. Mich. 2009).
In Re Alan Wayne Raynard, 327 B.R. 623 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2005). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451 (l)(o). ■This exemption is available to the Ray-nards because the Raynards filed their petition on January 13, 2005, ten days after the new legislation became effective.”
Shapiro v. Sassak, 426 B.R. 680 (E.D. Mich. 2010).
In Re Gosnick, 400 B.R. 582 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2008).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5451(l)(p) — 1 case
In Re Trofatter, 424 B.R. 247 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.