Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744 (2026)

Issuance of writ of restitution; conditions; foreclosure of equitable right of redemption.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.5744 Issuance of writ of restitution; conditions; foreclosure of equitable right of redemption.

Sec. 5744.

    (1) Subject to the time restrictions of this section, the court entering a judgment for possession in a summary proceeding shall issue a writ commanding a court officer appointed by or a bailiff of the issuing court, the sheriff or a deputy sheriff of the county in which the issuing court is located, or an officer of the law enforcement agency of the local unit of government in which the issuing court is located to restore the plaintiff to and put the plaintiff in full, peaceful possession of the premises by removing all occupants and all personal property from the premises and doing either of the following:

    (a) Leaving the property in an area open to the public or in the public right-of-way.

    (b) Delivering the property to the sheriff as authorized by the sheriff.

    (2) Abandonment of the premises that is the subject of a writ under subsection (1) and of any personal property on the premises must be determined by the officer, bailiff, sheriff, or deputy sheriff serving the writ.

    (3) On conditions determined by the court, a writ of restitution may be issued immediately after the entry of a judgment for possession if any of the following is pleaded and proved, with notice, to the satisfaction of the court:

    (a) The premises are subject to inspection and certificate of compliance under the housing law of Michigan, 1917 PA 167, MCL 125.401 to 125.543, and the certificate or temporary certificate has not been issued and the premises have been ordered vacated.

    (b) Forcible entry was made contrary to law.

    (c) Entry was made peaceably but possession is unlawfully held by force.

    (d) The defendant came into possession by trespass without color of title or other possessory interest.

    (e) The tenant, willfully or negligently, is causing a serious and continuing health hazard to exist on the premises or is causing extensive and continuing injury to the premises and is neglecting or refusing either to deliver up possession after demand or to substantially restore or repair the premises.

    (f) The action is an action to which section 5714(1)(b) applies.

    (4) If a judgment for possession is based on forfeiture of an executory contract for the purchase of the premises, a writ of restitution must not be issued until the expiration of 90 days after the entry of judgment for possession if less than 50% of the purchase price has been paid or until the expiration of 6 months after the entry of judgment for possession if 50% or more of the purchase price has been paid.

    (5) If subsections (3) and (4) do not apply, a writ of restitution must not be issued until the expiration of 10 days after the entry of the judgment for possession.

    (6) If an appeal is taken or a motion for new trial is filed before the expiration of the period during which a writ of restitution must not be issued and if a bond to stay proceedings is filed, the period during which the writ must not be issued is tolled until the disposition of the appeal or motion for new trial is final.

    (7) If a judgment for possession is for nonpayment of money due under a tenancy or for nonpayment of money required to be paid under or any other material breach of an executory contract for purchase of the premises, the writ of restitution must not be issued if, within the time provided, the amount stated in the judgment, with the taxed costs, is paid to the plaintiff and other material breaches of the executory contract for purchase of the premises are cured.

    (8) Issuance of a writ of restitution following entry of a judgment for possession because of the forfeiture of an executory contract for the purchase of the premises forecloses any equitable right of redemption that the purchaser has or could claim in the premises.

History: Add. 1972, Act 120, Eff. July 1, 1972 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 105, Eff. Sept. 1, 2004 ;-- Am. 2019, Act 2, Eff. July 2, 2019

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 41 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Wilson v. Taylor, 577 N.W.2d 100 (Mich. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wilson v. Taylor, 577 N.W.2d 100 (Mich. 1998). · cites it 10× “§ 600.5744(3) [3] and (6) [4] ; M.S.A. § 27A.”
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 596 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 1999). · cites it 7× “STATUTORY ANALYSIS When a judgment for possession is entered in a landlord’s favor, MCL 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744 permits the issuance of a writ of restitution.”
Flynn v Korneffel, 547 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 1996). · cites it 14× “§ 600.5744; M.S.A. § 27A.5744. [4] The instant land contract provided that on default by the vendee the Seller immediately after such default shall have the right to declare the same forfeited and void, and retain whatever may have been paid hereon, and all improvements that may…”
Birznieks v. Cooper, 275 N.W.2d 221 (Mich. 1979). · cites it 7× “MCL 600.5744(3); MSA 27A.5744(3). If the default is not cured "within the time provided”, a writ will issue restoring the seller to possession of the premises.”
Gruskin v. Fisher, 273 N.W.2d 893 (Mich. 1979). · cites it 2× “[8] MCL 600.5744(3); MSA 27A.5744(3). [9] See, e.”
1300 Lafayette East Coop., Inc v. Savoy, 773 N.W.2d 57 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “The judgment may include an award of costs, enforceable in the same manner as other civil judgments for money in the same court.”
Mazur v. Young, 507 F.3d 1013 (6th Cir. 2007). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744 (1). At that point, the seller can keep the property, sell the property, or do with it whatever the seller pleases.”
Johnston v. Sterling Mortg. & Inv. Co., 315 Mich. App. 724 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “The statute governing redemption in this situation, MCLA 600.5744(6); MSA 27A.5744(6) reads: When the judgment for possession is for nonpayment of money due under a tenancy or for nonpayment of moneys required to be paid under or any other material breach of an executory…”
Karakas v. Dost, 240 N.W.2d 743 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 3× “A writ of restitution was issued, pursuant to MCLA 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744, against James Karakas on July 5, 1973.”
In re Madison Heights Grp., LLC, 506 B.R. 734 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2014). · cites it 2× “Laws section 600.5744(6) (“writ of restitution shall not issue if .”
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 561 N.W.2d 484 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 5× “Ward’s motion to modify an earlier order of the trial court, which stated that the appropriate interpretation of MCL 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744 was to be decided by a jury.”
In Re Owens, 27 B.R. 946 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 600.5744 following the entry of a judgment of Land Contract forfeiture.”
Show all 41 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744(1) — 4 cases
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 596 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 1999). “STATUTORY ANALYSIS When a judgment for possession is entered in a landlord’s favor, MCL 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744 permits the issuance of a writ of restitution.”
1300 Lafayette East Coop., Inc v. Savoy, 773 N.W.2d 57 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “The judgment may include an award of costs, enforceable in the same manner as other civil judgments for money in the same court.”
Dutch Baker v. Roy Betham (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
Carl a Anderson v. Carole Chaundy (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744(3) — 7 cases
Wilson v. Taylor, 577 N.W.2d 100 (Mich. 1998). “§ 600.5744(3) [3] and (6) [4] ; M.S.A. § 27A.”
Flynn v Korneffel, 547 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 1996). “§ 600.5744; M.S.A. § 27A.5744. [4] The instant land contract provided that on default by the vendee the Seller immediately after such default shall have the right to declare the same forfeited and void, and retain whatever may have been paid hereon, and all improvements that may…”
Gruskin v. Fisher, 273 N.W.2d 893 (Mich. 1979). “[8] MCL 600.5744(3); MSA 27A.5744(3). [9] See, e.”
Birznieks v. Cooper, 275 N.W.2d 221 (Mich. 1979). “MCL 600.5744(3); MSA 27A.5744(3). If the default is not cured "within the time provided”, a writ will issue restoring the seller to possession of the premises.”
Entingh v. Grooters, 600 N.W.2d 415 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744(4) — 5 cases
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 596 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 1999). “STATUTORY ANALYSIS When a judgment for possession is entered in a landlord’s favor, MCL 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744 permits the issuance of a writ of restitution.”
In Re O.H. Holding Co., 132 B.R. 568 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1991).
Maria Vasiliadis v. Jamal Rubaii (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
S. (E.D. Mich. 2024).
Bertha Baldwin v. Michael Edward Williams (Mich. Ct. App. 2026).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744(5) — 4 cases
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 596 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 1999). “STATUTORY ANALYSIS When a judgment for possession is entered in a landlord’s favor, MCL 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744 permits the issuance of a writ of restitution.”
Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward, 561 N.W.2d 484 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “Ward’s motion to modify an earlier order of the trial court, which stated that the appropriate interpretation of MCL 600.5744; MSA 27A.5744 was to be decided by a jury.”
Rolondo Campbell v. U-Win Props. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
Rolondo Campbell v. U-Win Props. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744(6) — 10 cases
Wilson v. Taylor, 577 N.W.2d 100 (Mich. 1998). “§ 600.5744(3) [3] and (6) [4] ; M.S.A. § 27A.”
Flynn v Korneffel, 547 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 1996). “§ 600.5744; M.S.A. § 27A.5744. [4] The instant land contract provided that on default by the vendee the Seller immediately after such default shall have the right to declare the same forfeited and void, and retain whatever may have been paid hereon, and all improvements that may…”
Birznieks v. Cooper, 275 N.W.2d 221 (Mich. 1979). “MCL 600.5744(3); MSA 27A.5744(3). If the default is not cured "within the time provided”, a writ will issue restoring the seller to possession of the premises.”
Johnston v. Sterling Mortg. & Inv. Co., 315 Mich. App. 724 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “The statute governing redemption in this situation, MCLA 600.5744(6); MSA 27A.5744(6) reads: When the judgment for possession is for nonpayment of money due under a tenancy or for nonpayment of moneys required to be paid under or any other material breach of an executory…”
In re Madison Heights Grp., LLC, 506 B.R. 734 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2014). “Laws section 600.5744(6) (“writ of restitution shall not issue if .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5744(7) — 5 cases
Matter of Delex Mgmt., 155 B.R. 161 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1993).
Corrigan v. Aetna Life & Cas., 364 N.W.2d 728 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
Gillam v. Samuels, 32 B.R. 393 (E.D. Mich. 1983).
First Nat'l Bank of Lapeer v. Kelly (In Re Kelly), 51 B.R. 9 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1984).
Silver Valley Dev. v. Est. of Philip Bissel Shaver (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.