Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5837

Accrual of claim; alimony.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.5837 Accrual of claim; alimony.

Sec. 5837.

    The claims for alimony payments accrue as each payment falls due.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2024 · leading case: H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co. (1999) michctapp · cites it 2× “5836, claims for alimony payments, MCL 600.5837; MSA 27A.5837, or claims for monthly pension payments, Harris v City of Allen Park, 193 Mich App 103, 107 ; *563 483 NW2d 434 (1992), all of which accrue as each payment becomes due.”
Ewing v. Bolden (1992) michctapp “Rybinski v Rybinski, 333 Mich 592, 596 ; 53 NW2d 386 (1952); MCL 600.5837; MSA 27 A.5837. In this case, the full amount of child support became due on January 28, 1973, when the minor child reached the age of eighteen years.”
Frank v. Linkner (2015) michctapp “5836 (“claims on an installment contract accrue as each installment falls due”); MCL 600.5837 (“claims for alimony payments accrue as each payment falls due”).”
TUCKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Allied Chucker Co. (1999) michctapp · cites it 2× “§ 600.5837; MSA 27A.5837, or claims for monthly pension payments, Harris v.”
Center Street Lofts Condominium Assn v. Center Street Partners LLC (2016) michctapp “-6- Under MCL 600.5837, “the period of limitations runs from the time the claim accrues,” and “the claim accrues at the time the wrong upon which the claim is based was done regardless of the time when damage results.”
Patricia Wendel v. Ford Motor Company (2024) michctapp “5836); alimony (MCL 600.5837); and malpractice (MCL 600.5838).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.