Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6101

Proceedings supplementary to judgment.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.6101 Proceedings supplementary to judgment.

Sec. 6101.

    A proceeding under this chapter may be maintained until the judgment is satisfied, vacated, or barred by the statute of limitations.

History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1964–2025 · leading case: Green v. Ziegelman
Green v. Ziegelman (2009) michctapp “Approximately three months later, plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion under the proceedings supplementary to judgment act (PSJA), which is found at MCL 600.6101 et seq., and MCR 2.621. In the motion, plaintiffs requested an order requiring NZA to produce a laundry list of…”
Berar Enterprises, Inc v. Harmon (1980) michctapp · cites it 2× “appeals as of right from a judgment entered in Livingston County Circuit Court on September 25, 1978, in supplementary proceedings brought pursuant to MCL 600.6101 et seq.; MSA 27A.6101 et seq.”
DeYoung v. Mesler (1964) mich · cites it 2× “Clark Mesler's judgment creditors were entitled to reach his determinable moiety interest therein *509 and the trial court erred in denying them the relief they sought by proceedings following judgment as now permitted by chapter 61 of the revised judicature act (CLS 1961, §…”
Comerica Bank v. Esshaki (2018) mied “See M.C.R. 2.6 21 ("When a party to a civil action obtains a money judgment, that party may, by motion in that action or by a separate civil action.”
Daws Excavating LLC v. Camp Retreats Foundation (2018) michctapp · cites it 3× “Believing that Rajabali, who was the president of both Camp Retreats and Tawheed -1- and executed the quit-claim deed, transferred the Klam Road property to avoid paying the judgment, plaintiff filed a motion for proceedings supplemental to the judgment pursuant to MCL 600.6101…”
Daws Excavating LLC v. Camp Retreats Foundation (2018) michctapp · cites it 3× “Believing that Rajabali, who was the president of both Camp Retreats and Tawheed -1- and executed the quit-claim deed, transferred the Klam Road property to avoid paying the judgment, plaintiff filed a motion for proceedings supplemental to the judgment pursuant to MCL 600.6101…”
Murrells Inlet Corporation v. Abraham Nunu (2019) michctapp “MCL 600.6101 provides: “A proceeding under this chapter may be maintained until the judgment is satisfied, vacated, or barred by the statute of limitations.”
Bob Woodward v. Christopher Schwartz (2020) michctapp “He then concludes as follows: GURWIN nevertheless requested authority to list Petitioner’s home with a realtor, more than one month after Receiver knew the realty had been foreclosed by the first mortgagee, and, that Appellant no longer owned the real property.”
Lynn Beth Baum v. David Baum (2022) michctapp “While they were ongoing, Lynn moved for relief supplementary to judgment under MCL 600.6101 et seq. and MCR 2.621. The court granted her motion and, on November 14, 2019 entered the following injunction: [A]n injunction is issued against Alliance and Howard Baum, their officers,…”
Darnell Hairston v. Josh Lku (2023) michctapp “621 and MCL 600.6101. Hairston and Specialty Industries stated that they entered into an agreement under which Specialty Industries agreed to pay $1 million to Hairston and assign him its claims against its insurers or choses in action1 that it might have against Burlington and…”
Can IV Packard Square LLC v. Craig Schubiner (2024) michctapp “MCL 600.6101 et seq.; MCR 2.621(A)(2). In this case, plaintiff moved for post-judgment supplementary proceedings seeking to set aside defendant’s conveyances of property to intervening defendant 305 under Michigan’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (UVTA), MCL 566.”
John Mighion LLC v. Mht Family Properties I LLC (2025) michctapp “621(A) and MCL 600.6101, et seq., specifically under MCL 600.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.