Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.863 (2026)

Repealed. 2016, Act 186, Eff. Sept. 27, 2016.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.863 Repealed. 2016, Act 186, Eff. Sept. 27, 2016.

    Repealed. 2016, Act 186, Eff. Sept. 27, 2016.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to appeal to circuit court and court of appeals.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1980–1993 · leading case: People v. Hana, 504 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Hana, 504 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. 1993). · cites it 2× “[16] The record indicates that while defense counsel objected to the testimony of the police officers, defense counsel failed to object to testimony by the court psychologist that defendant admitted "to the offenses that he's being charged with .”
People v. Dunbar, 377 N.W.2d 262 (Mich. 1985). · cites it 2× “22) (repealed by 1978 PA 543 , § 1, effective July 1, 1979, and replaced by MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863), which affirmed the waiver decision on July 20, 1979, several months after the defendant's trial and sentencing.”
In Re Swanson Est., 296 N.W.2d 256 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “861, which provides, inter alia, that a party to a proceeding in the probate court may appeal as a matter of right to the Court of Appeals from a "final order affecting the rights or interests of any interested person in an estate or trust" and MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863, which…”
In Re Ferris, 391 N.W.2d 468 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The guardian ad litem filed a motion to affirm, which was joined by petitioner, arguing that respondent may not raise issues arising from the adjudicative hearing on appeal of right to this Court following the order of termination.”
In the Matter of Wilson, 317 N.W.2d 309 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863, the prosecutor appealed to the Wayne County Circuit Court, which affirmed the order of the juvenile court.”
In Re Irving, 352 N.W.2d 295 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “866 states that: "All appeals from the probate court shall be on a written transcript of the record made in the probate court or on a record settled and agreed to by the parties and approved by the court.”
In Re Dupras, 363 N.W.2d 26 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “861 and MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863 permitted direct appeals to the circuit court from any order of the probate court at the time of the December 10, 1979, order.”
People v. Billington, 323 N.W.2d 343 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “These statutes have now been superseded by the Revised Judicature Act, specifically by MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863, which states that a person aggrieved by a final order, sentence or judgment of a probate court may appeal from that order to the circuit court; appeal to this Court…”
In Re Emmons, 419 N.W.2d 449 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “See MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863. In the case of In re Ferris, 151 Mich App 736 ; 391 NW2d 468 (1986), a panel of this Court concluded that, since questions arising from the adjudicative hearing involve subject-matter jurisdiction, such issues may always be raised, even on…”
In the Matter of Meeboer, 350 N.W.2d 868 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “The circuit court, on stipulation of the parties, dismissed the appeal on the basis that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over such an appeal pursuant to MCL 600.863(1); MSA 27A.863G) because Meeboer’s conviction was appealable to the Court of Appeals pursuant to MCL 600.”
In the Matter of Summerville, 384 N.W.2d 152 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “861 and MCL 600.863; MSA 27A.863. On August 13, 1984, an order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failure to serve his sentence was issued by the juvenile court.”
In the Matter of Antieau, 296 N.W.2d 254 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “What then is the proper forum for appellate review of an order of this nature? MCL 600.863(1); MSA 27A.863(1) provides that, unless prohibited by statute, a person aggrieved by an order, sentence or judgment of the probate court which is not appealable to this Court under MCL…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.863(1) — 4 cases
People v. Hana, 504 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. 1993). “[16] The record indicates that while defense counsel objected to the testimony of the police officers, defense counsel failed to object to testimony by the court psychologist that defendant admitted "to the offenses that he's being charged with .”
In the Matter of Meeboer, 350 N.W.2d 868 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “The circuit court, on stipulation of the parties, dismissed the appeal on the basis that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over such an appeal pursuant to MCL 600.863(1); MSA 27A.863G) because Meeboer’s conviction was appealable to the Court of Appeals pursuant to MCL 600.”
In the Matter of Antieau, 296 N.W.2d 254 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “What then is the proper forum for appellate review of an order of this nature? MCL 600.863(1); MSA 27A.863(1) provides that, unless prohibited by statute, a person aggrieved by an order, sentence or judgment of the probate court which is not appealable to this Court under MCL…”
Antieau v. Schalk, 296 N.W.2d 254 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.