Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.226 (2026)
Firearm or dangerous or deadly weapon or instrument; carrying with unlawful intent; violation as felony; penalty.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE
Act 328 of 1931
750.226 Firearm or dangerous or deadly weapon or instrument; carrying with unlawful intent; violation as felony; penalty.
Sec. 226.
(1) A person shall not, with intent to use the same unlawfully against the person of another, go armed with a pistol or other firearm, or a pneumatic gun, dagger, dirk, razor, stiletto, or knife having a blade over 3 inches in length, or any other dangerous or deadly weapon or instrument.
(2) A person who violates this section is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $2,500.00.
History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;-- CL 1948, 750.226 ;-- Am. 2015, Act 26, Eff. July 1, 2015
FormerLaw Notes:
See section 4 of Act 372 of 1927, being CL 1929, § 16752.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 252
cases (54 in the last 5 years), 1966–2026 · leading case: People v. Ackah-Essien, 874 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
People v. Ackah-Essien, 874 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “356a(l), carrying a weapon with unlawful intent, MCL 750.226, unlawfully driving away an automobile, MCL 750.”
People v. Mitchell, 835 N.W.2d 615 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “317, and carrying a weapon with unlawful intent, MCL 750.226. Defendant was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.”
People v. Parker, 795 N.W.2d 596 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “82, and carrying a dangerous weapon with unlawful intent, MCL 750.226. Because the prosecution failed to present sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction of carrying a dangerous weapon with unlawful intent for the reason that it did not present evidence that the…”
People v. Traver, 894 N.W.2d 89 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 750.226(1).3 Defense counsel cannot be deemed to have rendered ineffective assistance predicated on the failure “to make a meritless request or objection.”
People v. Davenport, 282 N.W.2d 179 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “On June 30, 1976, defendant was convicted by a jury of carrying a firearm with unlawful intent, MCL 750.226; MSA 28.423, and carrying a concealed weapon, MCL 750.”
People v. Bosca, 871 N.W.2d 307 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “A dangerous weapon is defined by MCL 750.226 as “a pistol or other firearm or dagger, dirk, razor, stiletto, or knife having a blade over 3 inches in length, or any other dangerous or deadly weapon or instrument” carried with the intent to unlawfully use the weapon against…”
Bartolo Fitchett v. Mitchell Perry, 644 F. App'x 485 (6th Cir. 2016). “224f; carrying a firearm with unlawful intent, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.226 ; and two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, Mich.”
Conny Moritz v. Jeffrey Woods, 692 F. App'x 249 (6th Cir. 2017). “82 , and one count of carrying a dangerous weapon with unlawful intent, in violation of Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.226 . Id. at 278-79 .”
People v. Smith, 225 N.W.2d 165 (Mich. 1975). “) MCLA 750.226; MSA 28.423. Without any question whatever, an M-l rifle is a "firearm” within the scope of MCLA 750.”
People of Michigan v. Torrey Craft, 927 N.W.2d 708 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “83 ; one count of carrying a dangerous weapon with unlawful intent (carrying with intent), MCL 750.226 ; and one count of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (felony-firearm), MCL 750.”
People v. Quinn, 487 N.W.2d 194 (Mich. 1992). “Furthermore, it realized the difficulty of proving the unlawful intent element under MCL 750.226; MSA 28.423, and noted that the proposed statute did not include that element.”
People v. Veling, 504 N.W.2d 456 (Mich. 1993). “[8] MCL 750.226; MSA 28.423. [9] MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.226(1) — 5 cases
People v. Traver, 894 N.W.2d 89 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 750.226(1).3 Defense counsel cannot be deemed to have rendered ineffective assistance predicated on the failure “to make a meritless request or objection.”
People of Michigan v. Norman Brown (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
People of Michigan v. Norman Brown (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
People of Michigan v. Jeffery Lavern James (Mich. Ct. App. 2020).
People of Michigan v. Joshua Michael Rosebush (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.226(2) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Jeffery Lavern James (Mich. Ct. App. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.