Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 773 / Act 175 of 1927
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 773.1 (2026)

Inquest; procedures.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


773.1 Inquest; procedures.

Sec. 1.

    A magistrate holding an inquest pursuant to Act No. 181 of the Public Acts of 1953, as amended, being sections 52.201 to 52.216 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, shall follow the procedures prescribed in this chapter.

History: 1927, Act 175, Eff. Sept. 5, 1927 ;-- CL 1929, 17403 ;-- CL 1948, 773.1 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 506, Imd. Eff. Jan. 22, 1981

FormerLaw Notes:

    See section 1 of Ch. 167 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 6089; CL 1871, § 7970; How., § 9583; CL 1897, § 11818; CL 1915, § 15645; and Act 48 of 1885.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1956–2021 · leading case: Swickard v. Wayne Cnty. Med. Exam'r, 475 N.W.2d 304 (Mich. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Swickard v. Wayne Cnty. Med. Exam'r, 475 N.W.2d 304 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 6× “; MCL 773.1 et seq. ; MSA 28.1169 et seq. [34] 1861 PA 88 provides that justices of the peace in incorporated cities in which a county coroner resides shall no longer hold inquests if the coroner is able to act, and that the coroner shall conduct inquests whenever, in his…”
Lipiec v. Zawadzki, 77 N.W.2d 763 (Mich. 1956). “That would relevantly mean all of the powers and duties enumerated in chapter 13 of the code of criminal procedure (CL 1948, §773.1 et seq. [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1169 et seq.”
People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold, 973 N.W.2d 36 (Mich. 2021). “), criminal investigations (Chapter XIII; MCL 773.1 et seq.), jurisdiction and procedure in justices’ courts (Chapter XIV; MCL 774.”
People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold, 973 N.W.2d 36 (Mich. 2021). “), criminal investigations (Chapter XIII; MCL 773.1 et seq.), jurisdiction and procedure in justices’ courts (Chapter XIV; MCL 774.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.