Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.69 (2026)

Minimum sentence ranges for class H.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


777.69 Minimum sentence ranges for class H.

Sec. 69.

    The following are the minimum sentence ranges for class H:

    

    PRIOR RECORD VARIABLE LEVEL

    Offense Variable

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    Level

    0

    1-9

    10-24

    25-49

    50-74

    75+

    

    points

    points

    points

    points

    points

    points

    I

    

    

    

    

    

    

    0-9 points

    0-1

    0-3

    0-6

    0-9

    0-11

    0-17

    II

    

    

    

    

    

    

    10-15 points

    0-3

    0-6

    0-9

    0-11

    0-17

    2-17

    III

    

    

    

    

    

    

    16+ points

    0-6

    0-9

    0-11

    0-17

    2-17

    5-17

    

History: Add. 1998, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 15, 1998

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: People v. Peltola, 803 N.W.2d 140 (Mich. 2011).
People v. Peltola, 803 N.W.2d 140 (Mich. 2011). · cites it 4× “The recommended minimum sentence within a sentencing grid is shown as a range of months or life.”
People v. Stokes, 877 N.W.2d 752 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “61 to MCL 777.69; Lockridge, 498 Mich at 365 (“[A] sentencing court must determine the applicable guidelines range and take it into account when imposing a sentence.”
People v. McCuller, 715 N.W.2d 798 (Mich. 2006). · cites it 2× “68 and MCL 777.69. All class F felonies fall in an intermediate sanction cell if the defendant has fewer than 50 PRV points.”
People v. Lucey, 787 N.W.2d 133 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “On the class H guidelines grid, MCL 777.69, the OV score column tops out at 16+ points and the PRV score row tops out at 75+ points.”
People v. Cunningham, 852 N.W.2d 118 (Mich. 2014). · cites it 2× “1 to MCL 777.69”). 6 See MCL 769.1f(l)(a) through (i) (listing the specific offenses).”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Elliott Reive (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “MCL 777.69. Accordingly, as the trial court correctly acknowledged, if 10 points had been assessed for OV 13, defendant’s applicable guidelines range would change from 0 to 17 months to 2 to 17 months.”
People of Michigan v. Tarone Devon Washington (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “1 through MCL 777.69. MCL 761.1(g) defines the term “felony” for purposes of the Code of Criminal Procedure as “a violation of a penal law of this state for which the offender, upon conviction, may be punished by death or by imprisonment for more than 1 year or an offense…”
People of Michigan v. Tarone Devon Washington (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “1 through MCL 777.69. MCL 761.1(g) defines the term “felony” for purposes of the Code of Criminal Procedure as “a violation of a penal law of this state for which the offender, upon conviction, may be punished by death or by imprisonment for more than 1 year or an offense…”
People of Michigan v. Angel Sue Potter (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “Second, the trial court noted that the Class H grid, MCL 777.69, under which defendant was sentenced, accounts for a total of only 16 offense variable (OV) points, whereas defendant’s total OV score in this case was 26 points.”
People of Michigan v. Kyle Anthony Young (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “21 through MCL 777.69. And, as we have already explained, the sentencing court articulated appropriate considerations to support its PWID sentence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.