Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 780 / Act 87 of 1985
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.775 (2026)

Effective date of article; applicability.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

WILLIAM VAN REGENMORTER CRIME VICTIM'S RIGHTS ACT


Act 87 of 1985


780.775 Effective date of article; applicability.

Sec. 25.

    (1) This article shall take effect October 9, 1985.

    (2) This article shall apply only to crimes committed on or after October 9, 1985.

History: 1985, Act 87, Eff. Oct. 9, 1985 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 21, Eff. June 1, 1988

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2014 · leading case: King v. Oakland Cnty. Prosecutor, 303 Mich. App. 222 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
King v. Oakland Cnty. Prosecutor, 303 Mich. App. 222 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “751 to MCL 780.775, “appl[ies] only to crimes committed on or after October 9, 1985.”
People v. Garrison, 852 N.W.2d 45 (Mich. 2014). · cites it 2× “751 through MCL 780.775, addresses felony convictions and contains the provision at issue in this case.”
People v. Littlejohn, 403 N.W.2d 215 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “See MCL 780.775(2); MSA 28.1287(775)(2). Defendant contends that the effective date of the act is July 10, 1985, and that defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution for acts of embezzlement that were commited prior thereto.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.775(2) — 2 cases
King v. Oakland Cnty. Prosecutor, 303 Mich. App. 222 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “751 to MCL 780.775, “appl[ies] only to crimes committed on or after October 9, 1985.”
People v. Littlejohn, 403 N.W.2d 215 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “See MCL 780.775(2); MSA 28.1287(775)(2). Defendant contends that the effective date of the act is July 10, 1985, and that defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution for acts of embezzlement that were commited prior thereto.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.