Class; Representative; Adequacy

10 issues with Minnesota opinions1977–2019

Reiterating disapproval of specific practicethin4 opinions · 1978–2002
Limiting discovery scope based on expert conclusionsthin3 opinions · 1977–2008
Analyzing typicality and representivity for class certificationthin1 opinions · 2000
Determining class numerosity under rule 23(a)(1)thin1 opinions · 2002
Determining typicality and adequacy of class representationthin1 opinions · 2002
Analyzing reliance and adequacy of class representationthin1 opinions · 2002
Distinguishing mandatory and non-mandatory class typesthin1 opinions · 2019
Determining adequacy of class representatives and counselthin1 opinions · 2002
Determining commonality and predominance for class certificationthin1 opinions · 1999
Assessing adequacy of class representatives based on personal conductthin1 opinions · 2002

Counts are Minnesota courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

Class; Representative; Adequacy