Rule; Class; Commonality

16 issues with Minnesota opinions1978–2014

Determining proper class action certification under rule 23thin4 opinions · 1987–2002
Determining class prerequisites under rule 23thin3 opinions · 2000–2012
Reviewing discretion in rule 25(a) requeststhin3 opinions · 2008–2014
Assessing class action requirements under rule 23(a)thin2 opinions · 1978–1985
Determining class action criteria under rule 23thin2 opinions · 1981–2002
Defining class scope and meeting rule 23 requirementsthin2 opinions · 1987–2002
Establishing prerequisites for class action certification under rule 23thin1 opinions · 2002
Distinguishing rule 23 analysis from merits evaluationthin1 opinions · 2009
Interpreting rule 23(b)(2) for defendant class actionsthin1 opinions · 1987
Determining class representative typicality under rule 23(a)(3)thin1 opinions · 2002
Determining class standing and rule 23 applicabilitythin1 opinions · 2002
Assessing typicality and adequacy under rule 23thin1 opinions · 2002
Assessing rule 23 predominance and reliance requirementsthin1 opinions · 2009
Determining the standard of proof for rule 23 requirementsthin1 opinions · 2009
Analyzing adequacy of representation and rule 23 requirementsthin1 opinions · 2002
Satisfying typicality and adequacy of representation under rule 23(a)thin1 opinions · 1985

Counts are Minnesota courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

Rule; Class; Commonality