Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 10. MULTIPLE BRANCHES OR OFFICES; OBSERVANCES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 10.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1984 c 628 art 2 s 4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1976–2004 · leading case: Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 10× “Section 10.02, headed "Permitted Uses", which states: Within a C-2 Commercial District, no building or land shall be used except for the following uses: * * * * * * 4.”
Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC., 669 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 2× “" Domke, supra, § 10.02. Finally, nonsignatories who are third-party beneficiaries may enforce an arbitration clause if the "contracting parties intended the third party to directly benefit from the contract.”
Save Lantern Bay v. Cass Cnty. Plan. Comm'n, 683 N.W.2d 862 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 8× “On May 6, 2003, fourteen days after the meeting, Save Lantern Bay appealed the PC’s decision in Cass County District Court, pursuant to section 10.02 of the Subdivision and Platting Ordinance: The decision of the Planning Commission shall not be final.”
Cornerstone Bible Church v. City of Hastings, Minn., 740 F. Supp. 654 (D. Minn. 1990). · cites it 6× “Customary home occupations pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 10.02, Subd. 11 and Section 5.71.”
White Motor Corp. v. Malone, 412 F. Supp. 372 (D. Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “Section 10.02 of the pension plan provided that “[t]he Company shall have the sole right at any time to terminate the entire Plan.”
Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Nishika Ltd., 565 N.W.2d 16 (Minn. 1997). “1992) (stating that proof of aggregate damages as a common issue is unique to class actions, and that, in traditional individual suits, a defendant’s liability to joined plaintiffs is the total of the damages “as proved for each of the joined plaintiffs”).”
McNamara v. Nomeco Bldg. Specialties, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Minn. 1998). “273 (1975), Reitz, Consumer Product Warranties Under Federal & State, § 10.02 (2nd ed.1987). Under 15 [U.S.C.A.”
Hamanne v. Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Health & Welfare Fund, 11 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (D. Minn. 1998). “J, § 10.02) (emphasis added). When exhaustion of remedies is required by a particular plan, the Eighth Circuit has held that the Plan's language must be strictly construed.”
Minn. Stat. § 10.02(2003): 1 case
Save Lantern Bay v. Cass Cnty. Plan. Comm'n, 683 N.W.2d 862 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “On May 6, 2003, fourteen days after the meeting, Save Lantern Bay appealed the PC’s decision in Cass County District Court, pursuant to section 10.02 of the Subdivision and Platting Ordinance: The decision of the Planning Commission shall not be final.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.