Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 10.07 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1961 c 561 s 17]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2003 · leading case: Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC., 669 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC., 669 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 2× “; Domke, supra, § 10.07. Principles of agency work to "prevent circumvention of arbitration agreements but also to effectuate the intent of the signatory parties to protect individuals acting on behalf of the principal in furtherance of the agreement.”

Hymanson v. City of St. Paul, 329 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Davis, Administrative Law Text, § 10.07 (3rd ed. 1972). In this sense, the relationship differs from that of an appellate court reviewing a lower court's findings of fact: *327 an agency could make new findings and decide contrary to the hearing examiner's recommendation.”

City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 343 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. 1984). “Davis, Administrative Law Text, § 10.07 (3rd ed. 1972). In this sense, the relationship differs from that of an appellate court reviewing a lower court’s findings of fact: an agency could make new findings and decide contrary to the hearing examiner’s recommendation.”

Cornerstone Bible Church v. City of Hastings, Minn., 740 F. Supp. 654 (D. Minnesota 1990). · cites it 2× “Applicant must make application required by Subdivision 6 of Section 10.07. B. Nursing Homes, Retirement Homes, Dormitories, Public and Parochial Schools and Churches, Fire Stations, professional offices, Day Care Center, Old Age Home, Library, Gift or Craft Shop and similar…”

Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 355 N.W.2d 446 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Davis, Administrative Law Text, § 10.07 (3rd ed. 1972). In this sense, the relationship differs from that of an appellate court reviewing a lower court’s findings of fact: an agency could make new findings and decide contrary to the hearing examiner’s recommendation.”

Contested Case of Residential Alternatives, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 387 N.W.2d 885 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Davis, Administrative Law Text, § 10.07 (3rd ed. 1972). In this sense, the relationship differs from that of an appellate court reviewing a lower court’s findings of fact: an agency could make new findings and decide contrary to the [administrative law judge’s] recommendation.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.