Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 106.171 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1985 c 172 s 133]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1949–1992 · leading case: Cnty. of Swift v. Boyle, 481 N.W.2d 74 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).
Cnty. of Swift v. Boyle, 481 N.W.2d 74 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “Minn.Stat. § 106.171, subd. 3 (1984) (emphasis added).”
State Ex Rel. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources v. Kandiyohi Cnty. Ex Rel. Bd. of Commissioners, 359 N.W.2d 266 (Minn. 1984). “Minn.Stat. §§ 106.171,.191, .201 (1982). The procedure for improving an established ditch also begins with the filing of a petition: [A] petition signed by not less than 26 percent of the resident owners of the property affected by the proposed improvement or over which the…”
Janssen v. Cnty. of Chippewa, 98 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 1959). “Proper notice was given pursuant to § 106.171 and the final hearing was held on April 24, 1958, at which time the board ordered that “the drainage improvement as reported or amended be established.”
In re Jud. Ditch No. 24, 87 F. Supp. 198 (D. Minnesota 1949). “§ 106.171. At the final hearing, as at the preliminary hearing, the court or board can modify the reports, or, it can order further inquiry and adopt the reports as modified at the adjourned hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.