Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 115B. ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND LIABILITY
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 115B.06 (2026)

Application To Past Actions

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Application of section 115B.05.

Section 115B.05 does not apply to any claim for damages arising out of the release of a hazardous substance which was placed or came to be located in or on the facility wholly before July 1, 1983.

Subd. 2.

[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 8 s 19]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1997 · leading case: Werlein v. United States, 746 F. Supp. 887 (D. Minn. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Werlein v. United States, 746 F. Supp. 887 (D. Minn. 1990). · cites it 12× “Minn.Stat. § 115B.06. Defendants maintain that all of the hazardous substances involved in this case were placed at TCAAP and Trio Solvents wholly before July 1, 1983.”
Soo Line R.R. v. B.J. Carney & Co., 982 F. Supp. 1365 (D. Minn. 1997). · cites it 37× “MERLA Claims for Economic Losses Carney argues Soo Line’s claims for economic losses under MERLA are barred under the repose provision set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115B.06 or, in the alternative, under the six-year limitations period set forth in Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.