Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 117. EMINENT DOMAIN
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 117.03 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1969 [Repealed, 1971 c 595 s 29]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1945–2016 · leading case: Burnquist v. Cook, 19 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. 1945).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burnquist v. Cook, 19 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. 1945). “1941, § 117.03 [Mason St. 1927, § 6539]), authorizing such proceedings, provides: “If such property be required for any authorized purpose of the state, the proceeding shall be taken in the name of the state by the attorney general upon request of the officer, board, or other…”
Iowa Elec. Light & Power Co. v. City of Fairmont, 67 N.W.2d 41 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 2× “Section 117.03 refers to “such property.” In the above three sections no distinction is made between real and personal property.”
State, by Peterson v. Anderson, 19 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1945). “The duty of the public officials to pay the aAvard is, by the terms of § 117.”
The Kelmar Corp. v. Dist. Court, 130 N.W.2d 228 (Minn. 1964). “1941, § 117.03 [Mason St.1927, § 6539]), authorizing such proceedings, provides: “ ‘If such property be required for any authorized purpose of the state, the proceeding shall be taken in the name of the state by the attorney general upon request of the officer, board, or other…”
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator v. East Grand Forks City Council (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 8× “, Code of Ordinances (EGFCO) § 117.03(B) (2010). A city council has “broad discretion” when determining whether to renew a liquor license, and this court’s scope of review “is a narrow one, which should be exercised most cautiously.”
— Minn. Stat. § 117.03(B) — 1 case
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator v. East Grand Forks City Council (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “, Code of Ordinances (EGFCO) § 117.03(B) (2010). A city council has “broad discretion” when determining whether to renew a liquor license, and this court’s scope of review “is a narrow one, which should be exercised most cautiously.”
— Minn. Stat. § 117.03(D) — 1 case
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator v. East Grand Forks City Council (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “, Code of Ordinances (EGFCO) § 117.03(B) (2010). A city council has “broad discretion” when determining whether to renew a liquor license, and this court’s scope of review “is a narrow one, which should be exercised most cautiously.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.