Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 12. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 12.11 (2026)

State Director; Personnel

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Division created in Department of Public Safety.

A Division of Emergency Management is established within the Department of Public Safety under the supervision and control of the governor and a state director of emergency management. The commissioner of public safety shall appoint the state director, who shall not hold any other state office.

Subd. 2.Personnel.

(a) As may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter, the state director may:

(1) employ technical, clerical, and other personnel; and

(2) with the approval of the governor, make expenditures within the appropriation made for that purpose or, with the approval of the Executive Council, from other funds made available to the state director for purposes of emergency management.

(b) Division personnel, except the director of emergency management, must be in the classified service of the state civil service.

Subd. 3.Facilities and resources provided.

The state director and other personnel of the Division of Emergency Management must be provided with appropriate facilities and resources in the same manner as provided for personnel of other state agencies.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Regents of the Univ. v. Applied Innovations, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minn. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Regents of the Univ. v. Applied Innovations, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minn. 1987). · cites it 3× “Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 12.11[A] (1986). AI has challenged the validity of plaintiffs’ copyrights, alleging that various aspects of the MMPI are not copyrightable.”
Gunderson v. Lake Cnty. Bd. of Health, 389 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Haydock, Minnesota Practice § 12.11, at 274 (1985). The trial court in granting the rule 60.”
Ryan v. Lodermeier, 387 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Haydock, Minnesota Practice, § 12.11 (2d ed. 1985). Here, even if the pleadings suggest that appellant will have a difficult task in proving his case, they do not show that he has no claim to present to the court by evidence.”
Income Allocation, LLC v. TruChoice Fin. Grp., LLC, No. 0:22-cv-00343 (D. Minn. June 9, 2023). “Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 12.11 (2022). The ‘427 copyright, however, is presumptively valid and TruChoice has not attempted to rebut that presumption, so it may be the basis for an infringement claim, if Income Allocation adequately alleges copying.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.