Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 121.15 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 71 art 8 s 26]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1998–2000 · leading case: Associated Builders & Contractors v. Carlson, 590 N.W.2d 130 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Associated Builders & Contractors v. Carlson, 590 N.W.2d 130 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 36× “1 Respondents sought a declaration interpreting Minn.Stat. § 121.15, subd. la (Supp.1997) as not requiring that their construction project follow the prevailing wage act; respondents alternatively challenged the enactment of Minn.”

Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura, 610 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 8× “[7] Once enacted the prevailing wage amendment was codified at Minn.Stat. § 121.15, subd. 1a (Supp.1997).”

Op. Atty. Gen. 159a-3 (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1998). · cites it 26× “the review and comment law, prior to the conduct of the election? OPINION We answer to your second question in the affirmative Minn. Stat. § 121.15 , subd. 6 (Supp. 1997) provides in relevant part that: A school district .”

Op. Atty. Gen. 159a-3 (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1998). · cites it 25× “Minn. Stat. § 121.15 , subd. 6 (Supp. 1997) provides in relevant part that: A school district .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.