Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 122.21 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases, 1950–1975 · leading case: Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 700 v. City of Duluth, 170 N.W.2d 116 (Minn. 1969).
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 700 v. City of Duluth, 170 N.W.2d 116 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 9× “, Section 122.21, relating to the annexation of land upon petition of a landowner to have his land detached from the school district in which it lies and have it attached to another school district, provides that such petition must have the consent of the board of the school…”
Thorland v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 44, 74 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 4× “iction to determine whether the consolidation is for the best interests of the territory affected? (2) If the trial court does have jurisdiction to determine whether the consolidation is for the best interests of the territory affected, does the evidence in this case sustain its…”
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Dev. Corp., 131 N.W.2d 29 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 6× “and determine petitions for dissolution and attachment before it hears and determines petitions for detachment and annexation when the several petitions are filed nearly simultaneously and are all presented to the board at approximately the same time; (2) whether the county…”
Common Sch. Dist. No. 1317 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 127 N.W.2d 528 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 18× “Certain of the freeholders proceeded under the provisions of § 122.21 to have their land annexed to Independent School District No.”
State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common Sch. Dist. No. 65, 54 N.W.2d 130 (Minn. 1952). · cites it 2× “(Section 122.21 provides for 10 days’ notice and the procedure for holding *157 such election.”
Sullivan v. Jt. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 102, 88 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 2× ““If the territory of the proposed consolidated school district lies in two or more counties, the petition or petitions shall be presented to the county superintendent of the county in which the greater portion of *381 such proposed consolidated school district lies,” and §…”
In Re Certain Sch. Districts, Freeborn Cnty., 246 Minn. 96 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 4× “With respect to the right of appeal from an order forming a consolidated school district, § 122.21, subd. 6, provides: "After the formation of any consolidated school district, appeal may be taken as now provided by law in connection with the formation of other school districts.”
Peterson v. Jt. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 116, 58 N.W.2d 465 (Minn. 1953). “This indicates legislative approval of the construction placed upon the statute by the attorney general governing appeals to the district court under §§ 122.21 to 122.27. “* * * Where a statute has received a known, settled construction we have said that upon reenactment the…”
In Re Order of Superintendent of Schs., Nobles Cnty., 239 Minn. 233 (Minn. 1953). “This indicates legislative approval of the construction placed upon the statute by the attorney general governing appeals to the district court under §§ 122.21 to 122.27. "* * * Where a statute has received a known, settled construction we have said that upon reenactment the…”
In re Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 63 N.W.2d 543 (Minn. 1954). “At a pre-trial conference it was stipulated that there was no issue as to whether the consolidation was for the best interests of the territory affected and the people residing therein; as to the sufficiency of the petition; or as to the irregularity of the election.”
State ex rel. Klitzke v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 88, 61 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1953). “The question of reorganization is always left to the voters by an election held, and vote canvassed and reported, in accordance with the provisions of § 122.21. Clearly school board members are eligible to serve in both capacities at one and the same time, and the school survey…”
State Ex Rel. Helling v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 160, 92 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 4× “I, 1 as far as material, reads: “* * * A notice of election shall be given, the question submitted, the election held and the vote canvassed and reported in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 122.21, for the submission of a similiar or like proposal *…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.