Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 122. SCHOOL DISTRICTS: FORMATION AND COOPERATION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 122.23 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1952–2015 · leading case: In the Matter of Reichmann Land & Cattle, LLP, 867 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Matter of Reichmann Land & Cattle, LLP, 867 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 2015). · cites it 15× “23 (b)(1) is ambiguous. The parties do not dispute that the normal growing season spans from the first planting in the spring to the first frost in the fall, so vegetation must be “sustained” within that period of time.”
Morlock v. West Cent. Educ. Dist., 46 F. Supp. 2d 892 (D. Minnesota 1999). · cites it 7× “See Minn.Stat. § 122.23, subd. 1. An independently elected board governs the new district.”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 35 v. Engelstad, 144 N.W.2d 245 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 6× “17], upon receipt of the assigned identification number, the county superintendent shall determine a date, not less than 20 nor more than 60 days from the date of the receipt by him of the assigned identification number, upon which date shall be held a special election in the…”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 561 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 35, 170 N.W.2d 433 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 6× “1961, § 122.23, subd. 2, proposing to consolidate the Grygla and Gatzke districts.”
In Re Appeal of Lego v. Rolfe, 129 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 2× “” We come then to a consideration of § 122.23, subds. 8, 9, and 10, dealing with consolidations.”
Walters v. Common Sch. Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585, 121 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. 1963). · cites it 3× “The trial court found the consolidation in the best interests of the territory affected and in substantial compliance with § 122.23 and ordered confirmation. Appellants moved for amended findings or a new trial and appealed from the order denying a new trial and from the…”
Bricelyn Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 55 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1952). · cites it 2× “52 12 of the act incorporated by reference § 122.23 of the consolidation laws, which in turn declared that consolidated districts formed under its provisions thereby became independent school districts, with the “powers, duties, and privileges now conferred by law upon…”
Common Sch. Dist. No. 1317 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 127 N.W.2d 528 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 12× “Others in the common school districts desired to proceed by consolidation under the provisions of § 122.23, so as to have their land become a part of Independent School District No.”
Bakken v. Schroeder, 130 N.W.2d 579 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 6× “Appellants further argue that when, if ever, the plat and supporting statement were finally corrected and completed so as to substantially comply with the statutes specifying what these documents shall show, it was after the dissolution petition had been filed and the latter…”
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Dev. Corp., 131 N.W.2d 29 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 2× “21, and consolidation proceedings under § 122.23. Minn. St. 122.21, subd. 4. See, also, § 122.”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 581, Edgerton v. Mattheis, 147 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. 1966). “” Since it is conceded that there is no authority in § 122.23, subd. 6, for an agency hearing, it is a necessary prerequisite to determining appellant’s legal rights, duties, and privileges only if it is required by the due process provisions of the State and Federal…”
Common Sch. Dist. No. 2667 v. Anderson, 142 N.W.2d 269 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 16× “2697, included in the consolidation plat, and that he desired the consolidation proceedings to be delayed until an opinion of the attorney general had been received with respect to the validity thereof, particularly in view of § 122.23, *466 subd. 3(c), which provides that any…”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 122.23(b)(1) — 1 case
In the Matter of Reichmann Land & Cattle, LLP, 867 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 2015). “23 (b)(1) is ambiguous. The parties do not dispute that the normal growing season spans from the first planting in the spring to the first frost in the fall, so vegetation must be “sustained” within that period of time.”
— Minn. Stat. § 122.23(b)(1)(h) — 1 case
In the Matter of Reichmann Land & Cattle, LLP, 867 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 2015). “23 (b)(1) is ambiguous. The parties do not dispute that the normal growing season spans from the first planting in the spring to the first frost in the fall, so vegetation must be “sustained” within that period of time.”
— Minn. Stat. § 122.23(b)(2) — 1 case
In the Matter of Reichmann Land & Cattle, LLP, 867 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 2015). “23 (b)(1) is ambiguous. The parties do not dispute that the normal growing season spans from the first planting in the spring to the first frost in the fall, so vegetation must be “sustained” within that period of time.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.