Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 125.12 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 161
cases, 1961–2015 · leading case: Sherek v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 699, Gilbert, 449 N.W.2d 434 (Minn. 1990).
Sherek v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 699, Gilbert, 449 N.W.2d 434 (Minn. 1990). “5 (1988) and Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b (1988), Sherek was not entitled to reinstatement from unrequested leave of absence to a teaching position in Independent School District No.”
Walter v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 457, 323 N.W.2d 37 (Minn. 1982). “457 from an order of the Martin County District Court declaring that the School District violated Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b (1980) by failing to offer respondent Rolf Walter, a teacher who had been placed on unrequested leave of absence, a two-fifths teaching position that…”
Freier v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 197, 356 N.W.2d 724 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “The discharge proceeding was brought pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 8 (1980). Freier had been accused of improper touching of students and insubordination.”
Mohn v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 697, Eleveth, 471 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “He was required to give the school district notice that he would not return as a teacher for the next school year or face sanctions for failure to report under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 8(c) (1986). By letter of July 27, 1988, the school district replied that it did not intend…”
Berland v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, Minneapolis, 314 N.W.2d 809 (Minn. 1981). “The school district argues that the statute interpreted in Foesch and Hendrickson referred to schools in cities not of the first class, Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b (1980), and that an interpretation of that statute is inapplicable to teacher tenure for schools in cities of the…”
Grinolds v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 597, 346 N.W.2d 123 (Minn. 1984). “His request for a hearing under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 9 (1982) was denied.”
Kroll v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 593, 304 N.W.2d 338 (Minn. 1981). “Appellant, a tenured school teacher in respondent school district, was immediately dismissed under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 8 (1980) as a result of an incident that occurred on April 25, 1979.”
Ganyo v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 832, 311 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1981). “Petitioner contends that the charges leading to the termination of her teaching contract were not supported by substantial evidence on the entire record and that a reasonable time, as required by Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6 (1980), 1 was not allowed to remedy any…”
Atwood v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 51, Foley, 354 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. 1984). “More specifically, the instant case requires us to reconcile the procedural rights accorded teachers placed on an unrequested leave of absence pursuant to a plan negoti *11 ated under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6a (1982), and our holding in Jerviss v.”
Johnson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 281, 494 N.W.2d 270 (Minn. 1992). “The court of appeals then held that although Johnson had no claim to reinstatement because the school district had unquestioned statutory authority pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 3 (1990) to decline to renew her contract, the school district was, nevertheless, required…”
Schmidt v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 1, Aitkin, 349 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “The bases of the Board’s decision were discontinuance of a teaching position, lack of pupils, and financial limitations, three of the statutory grounds of Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b (1982). Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the notice of proposed termination, the…”
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Bd. of Teaching, 545 N.W.2d 901 (Minn. 1996). “Under Minn. Stat. § 125.12 , subd. 9a (1990), Falgren elected to have his contested discharge proceeding heard by an arbitrator rather than by the school board.”
— Minn. Stat. § 125.12(1) — 3 cases
Roseville Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 623, 353 N.W.2d 691 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Pearson v. Sch. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 381, 356 N.W.2d 438 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Pearson v. Sch. Bd. of Ind. Sch. Dist. 381, 356 N.W.2d 438 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
— Minn. Stat. § 125.12(4) — 1 case
Geffre v. Metro. Council, 174 F. Supp. 2d 962 (D. Minnesota 2001).
— Minn. Stat. § 125.12(6b) — 1 case
Roseville Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 623, 353 N.W.2d 691 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
— Minn. Stat. § 125.12(8) — 1 case
Villarreal v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 659, 520 N.W.2d 735 (Minn. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.