Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 127.26 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 121A.40]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1998 · leading case: Bystrom ex rel. Bystrom v. Fridley High Sch., 686 F. Supp. 1387 (D. Minn. 1987).
Bystrom ex rel. Bystrom v. Fridley High Sch., 686 F. Supp. 1387 (D. Minn. 1987). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs also allege defendants violated the Minnesota Pupil Fair Dismissal Act of 1974, Minn. Stat. § 127.26 -.39 (1986). That same day, plaintiffs sought an order of this court restraining defendants from suspending the students and ordering their reinstatement.”
Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 811, 999 F. Supp. 665 (D. Minn. 1998). · cites it 2× “school board met the procedural requirements of the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act, Minn.Stat. § 127.26 et seq. Rather than appeal the Department’s final decision through thé state courts pursuant to Minn.”
Mrs. A. J. v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 478 F. Supp. 418 (D. Minn. 1979). · cites it 2× “§§ 127.26 to 127.39, was enacted in 1974.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.