Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 127. PROCEEDINGS, PROHIBITIONS, POLICIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 127.29 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 121A.45]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1979–1998 · leading case: Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 811, 999 F. Supp. 665 (D. Minn. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 811, 999 F. Supp. 665 (D. Minn. 1998). · cites it 4× “Finally, plaintiff alleges in Count Three that his suspension and expulsion from WabashaKellogg High School was in violation of Minn. Stat. § 127.29 , subd. 2. Both plaintiff and defendants have moved for summary judgment in this case.”
In re the Welfare of E.R.D., 551 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 127.29, subd. 1 (1994) (restricting school’s dismissal of pupils).”
Mrs. A. J. v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 478 F. Supp. 418 (D. Minn. 1979). “§ 127.29, subd. 1 provides the school shall not “dismiss any pupil without attempting to provide alternative programs of education prior to dismissal proceedings .”
Ex parte K.H. v. K.H., 700 So. 2d 1201 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 127.29, subd. 1 (1994).”... The Act allows a school to dismiss a pupil on three grounds: (1) ‘Willful violation of any reasonable school board regulation,’ (2) ‘[w]illful conduct which materially and substantially disrupts the rights of others to an education,’…”
Ex Parte KH, 700 So. 2d 1201 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 127.29, subd. 1 (1994)."... The Act allows a school to dismiss a pupil on three grounds: (1) `Willful violation of any reasonable school board regulation,' (2) `[w]illful conduct which materially and substantially disrupts the rights of others to an education,'…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.