Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 127. PROCEEDINGS, PROHIBITIONS, POLICIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 127.32 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 121A.49]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 811, 999 F. Supp. 665 (D. Minn. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 811, 999 F. Supp. 665 (D. Minn. 1998). · cites it 2× “Therefore, this court must afford the Department’s decision the same preclusive effect that would be given by a Minnesota court. Under Minnesota law, for collateral estoppel to apply to an agency decision, five factors must be met: (1) the issue to be precluded must be identical…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.