Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 13.49 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 13.355]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: Newman v. Brendel & Zinn, Ltd., 691 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Newman v. Brendel & Zinn, Ltd., 691 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “3a(a), is a matter of first impression, this court has construed an identical phrase in the context of the Data Practices Act, Minn.Stat. § 13.49,- subd. 1 (2000), concerning an employer’s release of employee’s social security numbers to a third party.”

Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. Mun. Employees, AFSCME Union Local 3456 v. Grand Rapids Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 645 N.W.2d 470 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “See Minn.Stat. § 13.49, subd. 1 (2000) (“social security numbers * * * are private data on individuals, except to the extent that access to the social security number is specifically authorized by law”).”

Manson v. State, Dep't of Emp. Relations, 613 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 13.49, subd. 1 (1998) (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.