Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 13. GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 13.49 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 13.355]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: Newman v. Brendel & Zinn, Ltd., 691 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Newman v. Brendel & Zinn, Ltd., 691 N.W.2d 480 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “3a(a), is a matter of first impression, this court has construed an identical phrase in the context of the Data Practices Act, Minn.Stat. § 13.49,- subd. 1 (2000), concerning an employer’s release of employee’s social security numbers to a third party.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Grand Rapids Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 645 N.W.2d 470 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “See Minn.Stat. § 13.49, subd. 1 (2000) (“social security numbers * * * are private data on individuals, except to the extent that access to the social security number is specifically authorized by law”).”
Manson v. State, Dep't of Emp. Relations, 613 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 13.49, subd. 1 (1998) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.