Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 135.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 354.07]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1985–2001 · leading case: Astleford Equip. Co. v. Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp., 632 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. 2001).
Astleford Equip. Co. v. Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp., 632 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. 2001). “§ 135.04 .” Jungbluth, 548 N.W.2d at 520 .”
L-O Distributors, Inc. v. Speed Queen Co., 611 F. Supp. 1569 (D. Minn. 1985). “§ 135.04 . The reason given for termination in the second notice of termination was L-O’s “steady decline in market share since [its] appointment.”
Astleford Equip. Co. v. Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp., 611 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 135.04 “designed to afford the dealership the opportunity to react and protect itself from the potentially devastating affects [sic] of an overreaching grantor”); Van Riper v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.