The purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act are:
(1) to provide oversight of powers and duties delegated to administrative agencies;
(2) to increase public accountability of administrative agencies;
(3) to ensure a uniform minimum procedure;
(4) to increase public access to governmental information;
(5) to increase public participation in the formulation of administrative rules;
(6) to increase the fairness of agencies in their conduct of contested case proceedings; and
(7) to simplify the process of judicial review of agency action as well as increase its ease and availability.
In accomplishing its objectives, the intention of this chapter is to strike a fair balance between these purposes and the need for efficient, economical, and effective government administration. The chapter is not meant to alter the substantive rights of any person or agency. Its impact is limited to procedural rights with the expectation that better substantive results will be achieved in the everyday conduct of state government by improving the process by which those results are attained.
Notes of Decisions
Jewish Cmty. Action v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 657 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 8× “State agencies, such as the DPS, have statutory authority to adopt, amend, or repeal their rules, but, subject to exceptions, *607 the agencies must follow the procedures designated in Minn.Stat. §§ 14.001 to 14.69. Minn.Stat.”
Sierra Club v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n (Minn. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2024). Fifth, Sierra Club argues that the PUC exceeded its authority when it issued the 2010 order.”
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Twp. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “1984) (addressing challenge to human rights commission’s order under the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (1982), which allow reversal if agency’s actions violate constitutional provisions, even though that act does not apply to municipal…”
United States Steel Corp., Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Minn. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “” DECISION Under the Minnesota Administrative Procedures Act (MAPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2014), we may affirm, remand, reverse, or modify an agency decision if a party’s substantial rights have been prejudiced because the agency decision was made in excess of the…”
— Minn. Stat. § 14.001(2) — 1 case
Jewish Cmty. Action v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 657 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
“State agencies, such as the DPS, have statutory authority to adopt, amend, or repeal their rules, but, subject to exceptions, *607 the agencies must follow the procedures designated in Minn.Stat. §§ 14.001 to 14.69. Minn.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.