Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 14.001 (2026)

Statement Of Purpose

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act are:

(1) to provide oversight of powers and duties delegated to administrative agencies;

(2) to increase public accountability of administrative agencies;

(3) to ensure a uniform minimum procedure;

(4) to increase public access to governmental information;

(5) to increase public participation in the formulation of administrative rules;

(6) to increase the fairness of agencies in their conduct of contested case proceedings; and

(7) to simplify the process of judicial review of agency action as well as increase its ease and availability.

In accomplishing its objectives, the intention of this chapter is to strike a fair balance between these purposes and the need for efficient, economical, and effective government administration. The chapter is not meant to alter the substantive rights of any person or agency. Its impact is limited to procedural rights with the expectation that better substantive results will be achieved in the everyday conduct of state government by improving the process by which those results are attained.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: Jewish Cmty. Action v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 657 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
Jewish Cmty. Action v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 657 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “State agencies, such as the DPS, have statutory authority to adopt, amend, or repeal their rules, but, subject to exceptions, *607 the agencies must follow the procedures designated in Minn.Stat. §§ 14.001 to 14.69. Minn.Stat.”
Minnesota Transitions Charter Sch. v. Comm'r of Minnesota Dep't of Educ., 844 N.W.2d 223 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2012). MAPA requires that administrative rules be promulgated after giving public notice and providing interested persons the opportunity to be heard.”
In the Matter of the Surveillance & Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Servs. & Etyane ... (Minn. 2023). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 14.001 (2022). D-6 Here, the Commissioner remanded the case to the ALJ after concluding that the ALJ made no findings of fact about the summary evidence because he may not have applied the correct legal standard under the Minnesota Rules of Evidence.”
In the Matter of the Appeal by Primrose Sch. of Arden Hills & Shoreview of the Order of License Revocation. ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “4 The Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2022), requires that after the ALJ provides their report pursuant to a contested-case hearing, each adversely affected party must be given time to file exceptions with the agency officials who will…”
Brad Hammerberg, as Tr. for the Leonard J. & Margaret T. Schubert Irrevocable Trust, dated June 23, 2005, ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “045 using the standard set forth in the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2022). Zahler v.”
City of Eden Prairie v. Travis R. Serafin, Relator, Pub. Employees Ret. Ass'n, ..., 7 N.W.3d 132 (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) is a creation of the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2022). See Minn.”
In the Matter of the Appeal of Rate Calculation for Cmty.-Univ. Health Care Ctr. (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2022). When reviewing an 5 agency’s final decision, we may either affirm or remand the case for further proceedings.”
In the Matter of the Appeal by Sheena Haack of the Order of License Revocation (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “The Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2022) (MAPA), governs our review of administrative decisions following contested-case hearings.”
Sierra Club v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n (Minn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2024). Fifth, Sierra Club argues that the PUC exceeded its authority when it issued the 2010 order.”
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Twp. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “1984) (addressing challenge to human rights commission’s order under the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (1982), which allow reversal if agency’s actions violate constitutional provisions, even though that act does not apply to municipal…”
United States Steel Corp., Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “” DECISION Under the Minnesota Administrative Procedures Act (MAPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2014), we may affirm, remand, reverse, or modify an agency decision if a party’s substantial rights have been prejudiced because the agency decision was made in excess of the…”
Ken Peterson, Comm'r, Minnesota Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., Relator. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “The MnOSHA board’s decision may be appealed “in accordance with the applicable provisions of [the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA), Minn. Stat. §§ 14.001 -.69 (2014)].” Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 14.001(2) — 1 case
Jewish Cmty. Action v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 657 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “State agencies, such as the DPS, have statutory authority to adopt, amend, or repeal their rules, but, subject to exceptions, *607 the agencies must follow the procedures designated in Minn.Stat. §§ 14.001 to 14.69. Minn.Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.