Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 14.06 (2026)
Required Rules
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Each agency shall adopt rules, in the form prescribed by the revisor of statutes, setting forth the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures related to the administration of official agency duties to the extent that those procedures directly affect the rights of or procedures available to the public.
(b) Upon the request of any person, and as soon as feasible and to the extent practicable, each agency shall adopt rules to supersede those principles of law or policy lawfully declared by the agency as the basis for its decisions in particular cases it intends to rely on as precedents in future cases. This paragraph does not apply to the Public Utilities Commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1968–2019 · leading case: In Re the Implementation of Util. Energy Conservation Improvement Programs, 368 N.W.2d 308 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
In Re the Implementation of Util. Energy Conservation Improvement Programs, 368 N.W.2d 308 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 14.06 (1984) requires agencies to adopt procedural rules in certain circumstances: Each agency shall adopt rules, in the form prescribed by the revisor of statutes, setting forth the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures related to the…”
Weber v. Hvass, 626 N.W.2d 426 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). “” Minn.Stat. § 14.06 (2000). A rule is “every agency statement of general applicability and future effect.”
L.K. v. Gregg, 380 N.W.2d 145 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Minn.Stat. § 14.06 (1984) further directs the Commissioner to adopt rules regarding the procedures to be used: Each agency shall adopt rules, in the form prescribed by the revisor of statutes, setting forth the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures…”
EF Johnson Co. v. Uniden Corp. of Am., 623 F. Supp. 1485 (D. Minnesota 1985). “See 3 Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[A] n. 6.1 (“in most cases it is the third, reasonable likelihood of success, factor which is determinative”).”
Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 375 N.W.2d 550 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “This issue was also raised in In re Implementation of Utility Energy Conservation Improvement Programs, where we held the MPUC erred by not properly adopting rules relating to its procedures as required by Minn. Stat. § 14.06 . Id. at 314 . The MPUC acknowledges it should have…”
In Re the Alleged Labor Law Violation of Chafoulias Mgmt. Co., 572 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “Relator now contends that the absence of rules deprived relator of due process, citing Minn.Stat. § 14.06(a) (1996), which provides: Each agency shall adopt rules * * * setting forth the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures related to the administration…”
In Re Assessment Issued to Leisure Hills Health Care Ctr. on March 2, 1992, 518 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “” Minn. Stat. § 14.06 (1990). Under the Minnesota APA, “rule” means every agency statement of general applicability and future effect, including amendments, suspensions, and repeals of rules, adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by that agency…”
Hestbeck v. Hennepin Cnty., 212 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. 1973). “7 Perhaps unique to this case, fairness to defendant surgeon might have been better promoted if the procedural effect of the application of the doctrine of res ipsa were viewed as shifting the burden of proof to defendants as urged in the treatise by Louisell & Williams, Trial…”
In Re the Appeal of Jongquist, 460 N.W.2d 915 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “Minn.Stat. § 14.06 (1988) also requires the DRS to adopt rules regarding its procedures for administering funds: Each agency shall adopt rules, in the form prescribed by the revisor of statutes, setting forth the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures…”
Taylor Corp. v. Four Seasons Greetings LLC, 171 F. Supp. 2d 970 (D. Minnesota 2001). “Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[A] n. 6.1). Once the movant has established the likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm is presumed.”
Todd v. Eitel Hosp., 237 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 1975). “2d 361 (1973); 1 Louisell & Williams, Medical Malpractice, § 14.06. 7 Booth v. United States, 155 F.”
Thimbleberries, Inc. v. C & F Enter., Inc., 142 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (D. Minnesota 2001). “Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[A] n. 6.1). Once the movant has established a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury is presumed.”
— Minn. Stat. § 14.06(a) — 2 cases
In Re the Alleged Labor Law Violation of Chafoulias Mgmt. Co., 572 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “Relator now contends that the absence of rules deprived relator of due process, citing Minn.Stat. § 14.06(a) (1996), which provides: Each agency shall adopt rules * * * setting forth the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures related to the administration…”
Hare v. State, Dep't of Human Servs., 666 N.W.2d 427 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.