Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 14. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 14.08 (2026)

Approval Of Rule And Rule Form; Costs

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) One copy of a rule adopted under section 14.26 must be submitted by the agency to the chief administrative law judge. The chief administrative law judge shall request from the revisor certified copies of the rule when it is submitted by the agency under section 14.26. Within five working days after the request for certification of the rule is received by the revisor, the revisor shall either return the rule with a certificate of approval of the form of the rule to the chief administrative law judge or notify the chief administrative law judge and the agency that the form of the rule will not be approved.

If the chief administrative law judge disapproves a rule, the agency may modify it and the agency shall submit one copy of the modified rule, approved as to form by the revisor, to the chief administrative law judge.

(b) One copy of a rule adopted after a public hearing must be submitted by the agency to the chief administrative law judge. The chief administrative law judge shall request from the revisor certified copies of the rule when it is submitted by the agency. Within five working days after receipt of the request, the revisor shall either return the rule with a certificate of approval to the chief administrative law judge or notify the chief administrative law judge and the agency that the form of the rule will not be approved.

(c) If the revisor refuses to approve the form of the rule, the revisor's notice must revise the rule so it is in the correct form.

(d) After the agency has notified the chief administrative law judge that it has adopted the rule, the chief administrative law judge shall promptly file an electronic copy of the adopted rule in the Office of the Secretary of State. The secretary of state shall forward one copy of each rule filed to the agency, to the revisor of statutes, and to the governor.

(e) The chief administrative law judge shall assess an agency for the actual cost of processing rules under this section. Each agency shall include in its budget money to pay the assessments. Receipts from the assessment must be deposited in the administrative hearings account established in section 14.54.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1973–1998 · leading case: State ex rel. Humphrey v. Strom, 493 N.W.2d 554 (Minn. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Humphrey v. Strom, 493 N.W.2d 554 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 2× “However, the "mere fact that injuries will be temporary and incident to the period of construction only is no ground for disallowing recovery, since a purchaser might pay less if he knew such injuries were to be inflicted.”
Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Transp., 447 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. §§ 14.08,14.131,14.-14, 14.15 (1988).”
Hestbeck v. Hennepin Cnty., 212 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. 1973). “7 Perhaps unique to this case, fairness to defendant surgeon might have been better promoted if the procedural effect of the application of the doctrine of res ipsa were viewed as shifting the burden of proof to defendants as urged in the treatise by Louisell & Williams, Trial…”
Kick's Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, 587 N.W.2d 57 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “Sackman, Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain § 14.08 (rev.3d ed.1989)). 4 Under governing law, temporariness — if the city succeeds at some point in showing that its action is not permanent— constitutes little more than relevant evidence in determining the amount of damages.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.