Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 145.412 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2022 [Repealed, 2023 c 70 art 4 s 113]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Hodgson v. Anderson, 378 F. Supp. 1008 (D. Minnesota 1974).
Hodgson v. Anderson, 378 F. Supp. 1008 (D. Minnesota 1974). “498 (Minn.Stat. § 145.412, Subd. 3(2) (1974)) providing that: “It shall be unlawful to perform an abortion when the fetus is potentially viable unless .”
Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997). “112, §§ 2, 12K, 12L, 12M (1996); Minn. Stat. §§ 145.412 , subd. 1(1), 147.”
State v. Rein, 477 N.W.2d 716 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “They argue that the right is absolute, unencumbered by any requirement to show necessity.”
State v. Wickstrom, 405 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “The grand jury indicted Wickstrom for second-degree felony murder, first-degree assault, and criminal abortion under Minn. Stat. § 145.412 , subd. 3 (1986). He was indicted for fifth-degree assault for the attack on Gonsoir.”
Hodgson v. Lawson, 542 F.2d 1350 (8th Cir. 1976). “Minn.Stat. § 145.412, subd. 3, provides that: It shall be unlawful to perform an abortion when the fetus is potentially viable unless: (1) the abortion is performed in a hospital; (2) the attending physician certifies in writing that in his best medical judgment the abortion is…”
Joel Marvin Munt, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent (Minn. 2025). “Munt does not 7 When Munt was convicted in 2011, abortion in Minnesota was governed by Minn. Stat. § 145.412 (2010). Section 145.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.