Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 15. STATE AGENCIES IN GENERAL
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 15.10 (2026)

Records Delivered To Department Heads

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The head of a department or other agency whose functions, powers, and duties are by Laws 1939, chapter 431, assigned and transferred to another department or agency, shall transfer and deliver to such other department or agency all contracts, books, maps, plans, papers, records, and property of every description within the department head's jurisdiction or control, and shall also transfer thereto any or all employees engaged in the exercise of such functions, powers, or duties. The head of such other department or agency to which such assignment or transfer is made is hereby authorized to take possession of the property, and shall take charge of the employees and shall employ them in the exercise of their respective functions, powers, and duties transferred as aforesaid, without reduction of compensation; subject to change or termination of employment or compensation as may be otherwise provided by law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1989–2003 · leading case: Alleco, Inc. v. IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co., 745 F. Supp. 1467 (D. Minn. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alleco, Inc. v. IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co., 745 F. Supp. 1467 (D. Minn. 1989). · cites it 2× “Alleco argues that section 15.10 of the Indenture provides grounds for the extinguishing of its conversion obligation.”
Munoz v. Kihlgren, 661 N.W.2d 301 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Steenson, Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance § 15.10 (3d ed.2002) (stating that “there is no doubt that the new words placed in the statute say [that] a negligence action for economic losses can be brought by a person who has not been paid for economic loss due to ‘lack of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.