Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2022 [Repealed, 2023 c 52 art 15 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1988–2018 · leading case: State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr., 887 N.W.2d 476 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr., 887 N.W.2d 476 (Minn. 2016). “2 (2014); and possession of drug paraphernalia, Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2014). Lugo moved to suppress the evidence seized during the vehicle search.”
State v. Brooks, 838 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. 2013). “5 (2012), possession of drug paraphernalia, Minn.Stat. § 152.092 (2012), possession of marijuana in a motor vehicle, Minn.”
State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinville, 890 N.W.2d 116 (Minn. 2017). “2(a)(1) (2016); and possession of drug paraphernalia, Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2016). On a motion to suppress, the district court ruled that deLottinville’s arrest was illegal because the warrant for her arrest did not authorize police to enter D.”
State of Minnesota v. Erica Ann Rohde, 852 N.W.2d 260 (Minn. 2014). “2(a)(1) (2012), and possession of drug paraphernalia, Minn.Stat. § 152.092 (2012), based on evidence that police officers found while performing an inventory search during the course of impounding Rohde’s car.”
State v. Wynne, 552 N.W.2d 218 (Minn. 1996). “They discovered a white powdery substance which proved to be amphetamine, a small amount of marijuana, and drug paraphernalia including three marijuana pipes, razor blades, and snorting tubes. Wynne was then arrested. Wynne was charged with felony possession of a controlled…”
State v. Hanson, 800 N.W.2d 618 (Minn. 2011). “1(2) (2010); and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.092 (2010). The State dismissed the felon-in-possession charge at an omnibus hearing, and a jury subsequently found Hanson guilty of the remaining charges.”
State v. Knoch, 781 N.W.2d 170 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “2(1) (2006), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.092 (2006). B. State v. Watson Watson was charged after law-enforcement officers seized a substance that was believed to be methamphetamine from her purse.”
State v. Hunn, 911 N.W.2d 816 (Minn. 2018). “2(a) (2016) ; and (3) a petty misdemeanor for possession of drug paraphernalia, Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2016). Hunn pleaded not guilty to all three charges.”
State v. Reese, 446 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “1(4); and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.092. The search warrant leading to Reese's arrest was procured on the basis of information *175 supplied by one Marvin Bergland.”
State v. Hatfield, 639 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. 2002). “2(1) (2000), one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2000), and one count of child endangerment, Minn.”
Hough v. Shakopee Pub. Schs., 608 F. Supp. 2d 1087 (D. Minnesota 2009). “Town Square staff called the police when they found the pipe, and Trevin was cited for possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.092. Kane Aff. [Docket No.”
State v. Borrego, 661 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “24 (2000); and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2000). Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to fourth-degree possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, in violation of Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.