Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 152.21 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2022 [Repealed, 2023 c 63 art 6 s 73]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1991–2016 · leading case: Vasquez v. Lewis, 834 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 2016).
Vasquez v. Lewis, 834 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 2016). “; Minn. Stat. §§ 152.21 et seq.; Mont. Code §§ 50-46.”
State v. Thiel, 846 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). “At the time of the offense, Minnesota had not determined that marijuana has an accepted medical use and did not recognize the use of marijuana for medical purposes outside of a limited research group testing the usefulness of marijuana in alleviating the side effects of…”
State v. Hanson, 468 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “The legislature has enacted a single exception, in the THC Therapeutic Research Act (TRA), exempting from criminal sanctions possession or use of marijuana for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy who are receiving the drug under the strict controls of an approved medical…”
Haumant v. Griffin, 699 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). “” Minn.Stat. § 152.02, subd. 7(1) (1990). The legislature has enacted a single exception, in the THC Therapeutic Research Act (TRA), exempting from criminal sanctions possession or use of marijuana for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy_ Minn.”
State v. LaRose, 673 N.W.2d 157 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “Minn.Stat. § 152.21. Appellant then argues that since possession of marijuana raises no different or heightened policy concerns, section 152.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.