§
Subdivision 1.No certificate issued.
The registrar shall not issue a certificate of title for:
(1) a vehicle owned by the United States;
(2) a vehicle owned by a nonresident and not required by law to be registered in this state;
(3) a vehicle owned by a nonresident and regularly engaged in the interstate transportation of persons or property for which a currently effective certificate of title has been issued in another state;
(4) a vehicle moved solely by animal power;
(5) an implement of husbandry;
(6) special mobile equipment;
(7) a self-propelled wheelchair or invalid tricycle;
(8) a trailer (i) having a gross weight of 4,000 pounds or less unless a secured party holds an interest in the trailer or a certificate of title was previously issued by this state or any other state or (ii) designed primarily for agricultural purposes except a recreational vehicle or a manufactured home, both as defined in section 168.002, subdivisions 16 and 27;
(9) a snowmobile; and
(10) an electric-assisted bicycle, as defined in section 169.011, subdivision 27.
§
Subd. 2.Dealers.
No certificate of title need be obtained for a vehicle owned by a manufacturer or dealer and held for sale, even though incidentally moved on the highway or used pursuant to section 168.27 or 168.28, or a vehicle used by a manufacturer solely for testing.
Notes of Decisions
First Nat'l Bank of the North v. Auto. Fin. Corp., 661 N.W.2d 668 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 168A.03(2) (2002). Because the dealer is not covered under the motor-vehicle-certification procedures, a security interest in the dealer-held vehicle is perfected through the general Uniform Commercial Code process of filing a financing statement with the Minnesota…”
State of Minnesota v. Steven Charles Lind (Minn. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 168A.03, subd. 1(2) (Supp. 2015) (providing that vehicles owned by nonresidents that are not required by law to be registered in Minnesota need not have Minnesota certificates of title).”
Iannacone v. New Holland Credit Co. (In Re Organic Conversion Corp.), 259 B.R. 350 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2001).
“§ 168A.03(7). 17 This conclusion both defeats the Plaintiffs first alternate argument — as there would have been no legally-required certificate of title for the screener on which to perfect a security interest in the first place — and establishes the first element of a mobile…”
— Minn. Stat. § 168A.03(2) — 1 case
First Nat'l Bank of the North v. Auto. Fin. Corp., 661 N.W.2d 668 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
“Minn.Stat. § 168A.03(2) (2002). Because the dealer is not covered under the motor-vehicle-certification procedures, a security interest in the dealer-held vehicle is perfected through the general Uniform Commercial Code process of filing a financing statement with the Minnesota…”
— Minn. Stat. § 168A.03(7) — 1 case
Iannacone v. New Holland Credit Co. (In Re Organic Conversion Corp.), 259 B.R. 350 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2001).
“§ 168A.03(7). 17 This conclusion both defeats the Plaintiffs first alternate argument — as there would have been no legally-required certificate of title for the screener on which to perfect a security interest in the first place — and establishes the first element of a mobile…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.