Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 176.305 (2026)

Petitions Filed With Workers' Compensation Division

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Hearings on petitions.

The petitioner shall serve a copy of the petition on each adverse party and file a copy with the office, together with an appropriate affidavit of service. Service and filing must be made as provided under section 176.285, subdivisions 1 and 2.

Subd. 1a.Settlement and pretrial conferences; summary decision.

The chief administrative law judge shall promptly assign the petition to a compensation judge under section 176.307, and shall schedule a settlement conference before a compensation judge, to be held no later than 180 days after a claim petition was filed, or 45 days after a petition to discontinue, objection to discontinuance, or request for formal hearing was filed.

All parties must appear at the settlement conference, either personally or by representative, must be prepared to discuss settlement of all issues, and must be prepared to discuss or present the information required by the joint rules of the division and the office. If a representative appears on behalf of a party, the representative must have authority to fully settle the matter. The parties shall serve and file a pretrial statement no fewer than five days before the settlement conference.

If settlement is not reached, the chief administrative law judge shall schedule a hearing to be held within 90 days from the scheduled settlement conference. However, the hearing must be held earlier than 90 days from the scheduled settlement conference if this chapter requires an expedited hearing to be held at an earlier date. The hearing must be held before a compensation judge other than the compensation judge who conducted the settlement conference. The compensation judge assigned to hold the hearing may choose to conduct a pretrial conference to clarify the issues and evidence that will be presented at the hearing.

Cancellations and continuations of proceedings are disfavored but may be granted upon the showing of good cause under section 176.341, subdivision 4.

The compensation judge conducting the settlement conference may require the parties to present copies of all documentary evidence not previously filed and a summary of the evidence they will present at a formal hearing. If appropriate, a written summary decision shall be issued within ten days after the conference stating the issues and a determination of each issue. If a party fails to appear at the conference, all issues may be determined contrary to the absent party's interest, provided the party in attendance presents a prima facie case.

The summary decision is final unless a written request for a formal hearing is served on all parties and filed with the commissioner within 30 days after the date of service and filing of the summary decision. Within ten days after receipt of the request, the commissioner shall certify the matter to the office for a de novo hearing.

Subd. 2.

MS 2020 [Repealed, 2022 c 32 art 2 s 13]

Subd. 3.Testimony.

Where the chief administrative law judge has substituted a compensation judge originally assigned to hear a matter, the testimony taken before the substitute compensation judge shall be considered as though taken before the judge before whom it was originally assigned.

Subd. 4.Striking from calendar.

A compensation judge, after receiving a properly served motion, may strike a case from the active trial calendar after the employee has been given 30 days to correct a deficient petition if it is shown that the information on the petition or included with the petition is incomplete. Once a case is stricken, it may not be reinstated until the missing information is provided to the adverse parties and filed with the compensation judge. If a case has been stricken from the calendar for 180 days or more and no corrective action has been taken, the compensation judge may, upon the judge's own motion or a motion of a party which is properly served on all parties, dismiss the case. The petitioner must be given at least 30 days' advance notice of the proposed dismissal before the dismissal is effective.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1954–2025 · leading case: Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., 685 N.W.2d 12 (Minn. 2004).
Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., 685 N.W.2d 12 (Minn. 2004). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. §§ 176.305, subd. 1a; 176.106, subd.”
Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 67 N.W.2d 656 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 4× “3 Section 176.305, subd. 3, provides: “Unless the commission orders differently, where testimony is taken before a commissioner or referee, the testimony is considered as if taken before the commission itself.”
Green v. Whirlpool Corp., 389 N.W.2d 504 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “We concur that the settlement judge did not have authority to grant the motion for a default award, but we do so only because his authority is plainly and narrowly limited by Minn.Stat. § 176.305, subd. 1 (1984), which provides in part: When any petition has been filed with the…”
Lauer v. Tri-Mont Coop. Creamery, 178 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. 1970). · cites it 3× “1967, § 176.305, subd. 2, required that a copy of such a petition filed with the commission shall be served upon each adverse party within 10 days thereafter by the secretary of the commission (together with a notice of hearing), there was a failure to comply with this…”
Zak v. Gypsy, 279 N.W.2d 60 (Minn. 1979). “Under § 176.305, subd. 2, within 10 days after a petition is filed, the commissioner of the department of labor and industry is required to serve upon the adverse party a copy of the petition and notice of hearing.”
Jorgenson v. Novak Fleck, Inc., 638 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. 2002). · cites it 2× “8 provides that, "[t]he commissioner does not have authority to make determinations relating to medical or rehabilitation benefits when there is a genuine dispute over whether the injury initially arose out of and in the course of employment, except as provided by section…”
James Jurgensen, Relator, vs. Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., & TBG Claims Servs., Respondents (Minn. 2025). · cites it 5× “Where no objection to the requested fee has been filed, the judge or court before whom the matter is pending shall issue a summary decision under Minnesota Statutes, section 176.305,[3] regarding the amount of attorney fees owing under this part and Minnesota Statutes, section…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.