Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 176.61 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1953 c 755 s 83]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1943–1950 · leading case: Hunter v. Zenith Dredge Co., 19 N.W.2d 795 (Minn. 1945).
Hunter v. Zenith Dredge Co., 19 N.W.2d 795 (Minn. 1945). “A claimant for workmen’s,, compensation, under § 176.61 (§ 4320), is guaranteed a right of review by the supreme court, which may examine findings of fact and determine whether they have a sufficient foundation in the evidence.”
Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co., 9 N.W.2d 6 (Minn. 1943). “” Section 176.61 (§ 4320) authorizes review by this court on cer-tiorari “of any award or disallowance of compensation or order involving the merits of the case or any part thereof made by the commission.”
Larson v. Le Mere, 18 N.W.2d 696 (Minn. 1945). “1927, § 4321), provides: “The supreme court, on review taken under section 176.61, shall have and take original jurisdiction and may reverse, affirm, or modify the award or order of disallowance reviewed and enter such judgment as may be just and proper; * * (Italics supplied.”
Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co., 43 N.W.2d 798 (Minn. 1950). “In the petition to vacate the award and grant a new hearing, which was made after the 30-day period permitted for review thereof on certiorari by this court, § 176.61, relator, as sole grounds therefor, set forth in detail certain testimony submitted at the original hearing,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.