Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 179.13 (2026)

Unlawful Interferences

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Unlawful acts.

It shall be unlawful for any person at any time to interfere with the free and uninterrupted use of public roads, streets, highways or methods of transportation or conveyance or to wrongfully obstruct ingress to and egress from any place of business or employment.

Subd. 2.Unfair labor practice.

It is an unfair labor practice for any employee or labor organization to commit an unlawful act as defined in subdivision 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Rep. Hill-Murray Fed'n of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High Sch., Maplewood, 487 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Rep. Hill-Murray Fed'n of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High Sch., Maplewood, 487 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 2× “RA defines "employer" to include: [A]ll persons employing others and all persons acting in the interest of an employer, but does not include the state, or any political or governmental subdivision thereof, nor any person subject to the Federal Railway Labor Act, as amended from…”

Allen v. Hennepin Cnty., 680 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “" Minn.Stat. § 179.13, subd. 1 (2002). Appellant contends that these claims are private causes of action under Edina Educ.”

Midwest Motor Express, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 120, 512 N.W.2d 881 (Minn. 1994). · cites it 4× “For example, Minn. Stat. § 179.13 (1992) specifically makes it unlawful to interfere with the free and uninterrupted use of public roads or to wrongfully obstruct ingress to and egress from any place of business or employment, and it also makes it an unfair labor practice for…”

McQuay, Inc. v. Int'l Union, United Auto., Aircraft & Agric. Implement Workers, 72 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 2× “Section 179.13 provides as follows: “Subdivision 1.”

Minnesota Nurses Ass'n v. McLeod Cnty., Relator, Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “The relevant language in section 179.13, subdivision 2, provides no exceptions or additional requirements.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.