Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 179.68 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1975–1985 · leading case: Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984).
Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984). “We affirm the district court and hold that the Regents' refusal to negotiate the tenure and promotion, faculty evaluations and academic calendar issues was not an unfair labor practice under Minn.Stat. § 179.68, subd. 1 (1982). MEA asserts that tenure and promotion, faculty…”
Minnesota Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 404, 287 N.W.2d 666 (Minn. 1980). “* Plaintiff, Minnesota Education Association (MEA), appeals from the order of the district court dismissing with prejudice its *667 unfair labor practice action brought under the Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA), Minn.Stat. § 179.68, subd. 2(1), (5) (1978), against…”
AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. Sundquist, 338 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1983). “Because the provision of PELRA that concerns employer unfair labor practices applies only to "public employers," Minn.Stat. § 179.68, subd. 2 (1982), and because the Legislature is not a "public employer" under PELRA, Minn.”
Foley Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 51, 353 N.W.2d 917 (Minn. 1984). “They allege that the school district committed unfair labor practices under Minn.Stat. § 179.68, subd. 2 (1982), by refusing to meet and negotiate its decisions to institute changes in teaching assignments and scheduling during the 1982-83 school year.”
Ogilvie v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 341, 329 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 1983). “The plaintiffs alleged that the school district had committed an unfair labor practice under Minn.Stat. § 179.68, subd. 2 (1982) by refusing to meet and negotiate the involuntary part-time transfer of Ogilvie to an adjacent school district pursuant to a joint powers agreement…”
Robbinsdale Educ. Ass'n v. Robbinsdale Fed'n of Teachers Local 872, 239 N.W.2d 437 (Minn. 1976). “” More importantly, § 179.68, subd. 1, of the act provides: “Any employee * * * aggrieved by an unfair labor practice * * * may bring an action in district court of the county wherein the practice is alleged to have occurred for injunctive relief and for damages caused by such…”
Finch v. Wemlinger, 310 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1981). “The appeal raises two issues: first, whether the dismissal of this non-union, unclassified public civil service employee constituted an unfair labor practice under Minn.Stat. § 179.68 (1980), and second, whether in an action in state court against a public official under 42 U.”
Minnesota Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 495, 290 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 1980). “Minn.Stat. § 179.68, subd. 2(6), establishes that it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to “refus[e] to comply with grievance procedures contained in an agreement * * *.”
Minnesota Teamsters Pub. & Law Enf't Employees Union Local 320 v. Anoka Cnty., 365 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “They contend that (1) respondents’ discontinuance of a “take-home” car policy constituted an unfair labor practice under Minn.Stat. § 179.68, *374 subd. 2 (1982) 1 ; (2) the union was not required to request negotiations prior to commencing this action for an unfair labor…”
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49 v. City of Minneapolis, 233 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1975). ““Meet and negotiate” is defined as the “performance of the mutual obligations of public employers and the exclusive representatives of public employees to meet * * * with the good faith intent of entering into an agreement with respect to terms and conditions of employment * * §…”
Gen. Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin Cnty. Bd., 320 N.W.2d 695 (Minn. 1982). “That the Motion for Summary Judgment of the County of Pope is granted in the following particulars: (1) That the County of Pope did not commit an unfair labor practice in respect to the defendant Lloyc [sic] Ochocki under Minn.Stat. 179.68. In all other respects such Motion is…”
Beckman v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 241 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1976). “Since imposition upon a nonmember employee of a “service fee” interferes with an employee’s exercise of this right, under § 179.68, subd. 2(1), of PELRA, it constitutes an unfair labor practice by the employer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.