Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 179.70 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1975–1988 · leading case: AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Reg'l Corr. Bd., 356 N.W.2d 295 (Minn. 1984).
AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Reg'l Corr. Bd., 356 N.W.2d 295 (Minn. 1984). “Minn.Stat. § 179.70, subd. 1 (Supp.1983).”
Arbitration Between Ramsey Cnty. v. Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 91, Local 8, 309 N.W.2d 785 (Minn. 1981). “Unable to settle the dispute, the parties submitted to compulsory binding arbitration as required by Minn.Stat. § 179.70, subd. 1 (1980) pursuant to Step 4 of the grievance procedure set forth in the agreement.”
Cloquet Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 94, 344 N.W.2d 416 (Minn. 1984). “See Minn.Stat. § 179.70, subd. 6 (1982). In virtually identical language, both PELRA and the parties' master contract expressly exclude matters of inherent managerial policy from the mandatory grievance arbitration requirement.”
Eisen v. State, Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 352 N.W.2d 731 (Minn. 1984). “” Minn.Stat. § 179.70, subd. 1 (Supp.1983) (emphasis added).”
Univ. Educ. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, 353 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1984). “See Minn.Stat. § 179.70, subd. 1 (1982). The sole remedy of a faculty member who prevails in grievance is an order to reconsider tenure or promotion.”
Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local No. 320 v. City of Minneapolis, 225 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1975). “Prior to that amendment, that section read: “Any provision of any contract required by section 179.70, which of itself or in its implementation would be in violation of or in conflict with any statute of the state of Minnesota or rule or regulation promulgated thereunder or…”
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 276 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1979). “5, states: “Any provision of any contract required by section 179.70, which of itself or in its implementation would be in violation of or in conflict with any statute of the state of Minnesota or rule or regulation promulgated thereunder or provision of a municipal home rule…”
Minnesota Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 495, 290 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 1980). “As required by Minn.Stat. § 179.70, 1 the master contract provides for arbitration of grievances as follows: A claim by a teacher or the [GMEA] that there has been a violation; misinterpretation or misapplication of any provision of this contract or misinterpretation or…”
Minnesota Arrowhead Dist. Council 96 of Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees v. St. Louis Cnty., 290 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 1980). “) Minn. Stat. § 179.70 . No provision in PELRA states that aspects of inherent managerial policy shall not be subjects of negotiation.”
City of Bloomington v. Local 2828 of the Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, 290 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 1980). “The union appealed, alleging that the actions of the district court involved a decision on the merits of the award and that under the facts of this case the arbitrator had jurisdiction to fashion an appropriate remedy.”
State v. Berthiaume, 259 N.W.2d 904 (Minn. 1977). “Although the choice of implications is perplexing, the well-established legislative policy of favoring arbitration as a means of resolving labor disputes, unmistakably reaffirmed by § 179.70, subd. 1, of PELRA, strongly favors the conclusion that the parties agreed to resolve…”
Gen. Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin Cnty. Bd., 320 N.W.2d 695 (Minn. 1982). “Minn.Stat. 179.70 Contracts; grievances; arbitration, Subd.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.