Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 179.72 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1984 c 462 s 28]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1974–1986 · leading case: City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 276 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1979).
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 276 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1979). “Minn.Stat. § 179.72, subd. 7. “9. In resolving the dispute the arbitration panel must give ‘due consideration to the statutory rights and obligations of public employers to officially manage and conduct its operations within the legal limitations surrounding the financing of…”
Schmidt v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 1, Aitkin, 349 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “(3) An arbitrator qualified by the State Public Employment Relations Board pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 179.72 (Supp.1983). District Counsel Role 3.”
Jerviss v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 294, 273 N.W.2d 638 (Minn. 1978). “The provisions of section 179.72 shall not apply for the purposes of this subdivision.”
Foley Educ. Ass'n v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 51, 353 N.W.2d 917 (Minn. 1984). “If, in the light of the history of the negotiations on the subject, the 1982-83 elementary school schedule can be said to have embodied a “change,” the teachers were notified of that change on delivery of the schedule at the end of May.”
Foesch v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 646, 223 N.W.2d 371 (Minn. 1974). “The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 179.72 shall not apply for the purposes of this subdivision.”
Ellerbrock v. Bd. of Ed., Sp. Sch. Dist. No. 6, 269 N.W.2d 858 (Minn. 1978). “The provisions of section 179.72 shall not apply for the purposes of this subdivision.”
Patzwald v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 306 N.W.2d 118 (Minn. 1981). “This finding is not necessary to BMS' conclusion that substitute drivers are not members of the bargaining unit and unfortunately such a finding resulted in the critical issue being improperly redefined as whether substitute drivers are public employees within the meaning of…”
Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412 v. City of Dearborn, 231 N.W.2d 226 (Mich. 1975). “1973); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 179.72 (Supp. 1974); Neb.”
City of Brooklyn Ctr. v. Minnesota Teamsters Pub. & Law Enf't Employees Union Local No. 320, 271 N.W.2d 315 (Minn. 1978). “In obedience to statutory limitations imposed upon public sector arbitration by § 179.72, subd. 7, by the express provision of Article VII, paragraph 7.”
Minnesota State Coll. Bd. v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 228 N.W.2d 551 (Minn. 1975). “1971, § 179.72, subd. 4, applicable at the time of the appeal, evidences the reason for not allowing this judicial review of decisions of the director of mediation services, in that such review is strictly within the power or scope of the PERB.”
Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local No. 320 v. City of Minneapolis, 225 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1975). “As support for this conclusion, we note that the legislature made no change in that part of § 179.72, subd. 7, which provides that “no decision of the [arbitration] panel which violates any provision of the laws of Minnesota or rules or regulations promulgated thereunder or…”
Arbitration Proceeding Between Arrowhead Pub. Serv. Union v. City of Duluth, 336 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1983). “5 (1982) subjects the arbitration proceeding to the limitations set out in § 179.72, subd. 7, which declares void the determination of any matter except terms and conditions of employment or other items contained in the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.