Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 18. NOXIOUS WEED LAW
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 18.0225 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2003 c 128 art 7 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1991 · leading case: Omdahl v. Hadler, 459 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Omdahl v. Hadler, 459 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 18.0225 (1989). The state noxious weed law, Minn.”
Holte v. State, 467 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 18.0225(a) (Supp.1989). Finally, we note that by statute: When the provisions of two or more laws passed at different sessions of the legislature are irreconcilable, the law latest in date of final enactment shall prevail.”
Minn. Stat. § 18.0225(a): 1 case
Holte v. State, 467 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “See Minn.Stat. § 18.0225(a) (Supp.1989). Finally, we note that by statute: When the provisions of two or more laws passed at different sessions of the legislature are irreconcilable, the law latest in date of final enactment shall prevail.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.