Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 18. NOXIOUS WEED LAW
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 18.271 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1992 c 500 s 16]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1990 · leading case: Omdahl v. Hadler, 459 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Omdahl v. Hadler, 459 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 6× “Minn. Stat. § 18.271 , subd. 3 (1988). In the summer of 1989, pursuant to the new grasshopper control law, the Commissioner of Agriculture determined that all of Marshall and Polk Counties should be designated as grasshopper control zones.”
Schleusner v. Murray Cnty., 416 N.W.2d 478 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 20× “Appellant contends that the order was erroneous because Lake Sarah Township did not give him the notice prior to spraying required by Minn.Stat. § 18.271 (1984). We reverse. FACTS In 1981, appellant, jointly with Ralph No-votny, purchased farmland in Lake Sarah Township, Murray…”
Delinquent Taxes of Carney v. Murray Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 384 N.W.2d 920 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “§ 18.271, subds. 1, 2. Section 18.271 further provides that when a person does not comply with the notice to eradicate: the local weed inspector having jurisdiction, or if there is no local weed inspector, the county agricultural inspector or the commissioner, shall cause the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.