Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 2. TERRITORIAL DIVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.04 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 45 s 70]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minn. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minn. 2014). · cites it 6× “Section 2.04 of the PSA provides in relevant part: The Depositior hereby represents and warrants to the Trustee with respect to each Mortgage Loan .”
Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Tech., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 661 (D. Minn. 1986). “1 Milgrim § 2.04 at 2-45; U.S.M. Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.”
Jostens, Inc. v. Nat'l Comput. Sys., Inc., 318 N.W.2d 691 (Minn. 1982). “” See also 1 Milgrim, Trade Secrets § 2.04 (1980). These efforts may extend both to internal secrecy, keeping the information in-house, and to external secrecy, keeping the information from those outside in the general trade or industry.”
Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Off. Bldg. Co., 290 N.W.2d 612 (Minn. 1980). “Digest 2d, Fraud, § 2.04 (3d ed. 1979), the “person” in this case is Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.”
EF Johnson Co. v. Uniden Corp. of Am., 623 F. Supp. 1485 (D. Minn. 1985). “See 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.04[c] (1981). Copyright protection is available whether the program is written in humanly readable source code, machine readable object code and whether the code is stored on ROM silicon chip or a disc or tape.”
Deantoni v. City of Bloomington, 421 N.W.2d 744 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 12× “Prior to Herbst’s retention as general counsel, the question was raised whether his simultaneous roles as council member and legal advisor to the Port Authority would constitute a conflict of interest or violate Section 2.04 of the Bloomington City Charter, which then provided:…”
Oudom v. Dudek (D. Minn. 2025). “A visual impairment value is calculated by calculated by adding visual acuity impairment value and visual field impairment value. Id. § 2.00A8d.”
Terry Lusk v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (D. Minn. 2025). “41 § 2.04—but each contract expresses the same intention that CHR will work to get the highest possible price for the growers.”
Styczinski v. City of Eden Prairie (D. Minn. 2025). “5 The “Facts Supporting Punitive Damages” section in the Proposed Amended Complaint refers to Eden Prairie City Code §§ 2.04, 2.30, and Section 2.80. (Dkt. 22-1 ¶¶ 154, 156, 177-78.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.