Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.04 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 45 s 70]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wolff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 6× “Section 2.04 of the PSA provides in relevant part: The Depositior hereby represents and warrants to the Trustee with respect to each Mortgage Loan .”

Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Tech., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 661 (D. Minnesota 1986). “1 Milgrim § 2.04 at 2-45; U.S.M. Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.”

Jostens, Inc. v. Nat'l Comput. Sys., Inc., 318 N.W.2d 691 (Minn. 1982). “” See also 1 Milgrim, Trade Secrets § 2.04 (1980). These efforts may extend both to internal secrecy, keeping the information in-house, and to external secrecy, keeping the information from those outside in the general trade or industry.”

Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Off. Bldg. Co., 290 N.W.2d 612 (Minn. 1980). “Digest 2d, Fraud, § 2.04 (3d ed. 1979), the “person” in this case is Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.”

EF Johnson Co. v. Uniden Corp. of Am., 623 F. Supp. 1485 (D. Minnesota 1985). “See 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.04[c] (1981). Copyright protection is available whether the program is written in humanly readable source code, machine readable object code and whether the code is stored on ROM silicon chip or a disc or tape.”

Deantoni v. City of Bloomington, 421 N.W.2d 744 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 12× “Prior to Herbst’s retention as general counsel, the question was raised whether his simultaneous roles as council member and legal advisor to the Port Authority would constitute a conflict of interest or violate Section 2.04 of the Bloomington City Charter, which then provided:…”

Oudom v. Dudek (D. Minnesota 2025). “A visual impairment value is calculated by calculated by adding visual acuity impairment value and visual field impairment value. Id. § 2.00A8d.”

Terry Lusk v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2025). “41 § 2.04—but each contract expresses the same intention that CHR will work to get the highest possible price for the growers.”

Styczinski v. City of Eden Prairie (D. Minnesota 2025). “5 The “Facts Supporting Punitive Damages” section in the Proposed Amended Complaint refers to Eden Prairie City Code §§ 2.04, 2.30, and Section 2.80. (Dkt. 22-1 ¶¶ 154, 156, 177-78.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.