Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 2. TERRITORIAL DIVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.09 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 45 s 70]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1969–2018 · leading case: Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Tech., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 661 (D. Minn. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Tech., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 661 (D. Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “This customer information also derives protection from the fact that defendants executed agreements not to use or disclose Surgidev trade secrets.”
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 167 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 2× “(2d) 610; 1 Davis, Administrative Law, § 2.09; Goldston and Scheuer, Zoning of Planned Residential Developments, 73 Harv.”
State v. Rosillo, 282 N.W.2d 872 (Minn. 1979). “…under Section 3.02 [relating to justification] this Section does not preclude such defense.” Model Penal Code § 2.09 (1962).”
In Re: RFC & RESCAP Liquidating Trust Litig., No. 0:13-cv-03451 (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2018). “) Instead, HLC proposes the Court use Eighth Circuit Civil JIG § 2.09: “The evidence you are about to hear may be considered by you only on the [issue].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.