Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.724 (2026)

Chief Justice Of Supreme Court, Duties

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Appointments.

When public convenience and necessity require it, the chief justice of the supreme court may assign any judge of any court to serve and discharge the duties of judge of any court in a judicial district not that judge's own at such times as the chief justice may determine. A judge may appeal an assignment to serve on a court in a judicial district not that judge's own to the supreme court and the appeal shall be decided before the assignment is effective. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, no judge shall be assigned to serve on a court in a judicial district which is located more than 50 miles from the boundary of that judge's judicial district for more than 15 working days in any 12-month period, unless the judge consents to the assignment.

A transferred judge shall be subject to the assignment powers of the chief judge of the judicial district to which the judge is transferred.

Subd. 2.Procedure.

To promote and secure more efficient administration of justice, the chief justice of the supreme court of the state shall supervise and coordinate the work of the courts of the state. The supreme court may provide by rule that the chief justice not be required to write opinions as a member of the supreme court. Its rules may further provide for it to hear and consider cases in divisions. It may by rule assign temporarily any retired justice of the supreme court or one judge of the court of appeals or district court judge at a time to act as a justice of the supreme court or any number of justices or retired justices of the supreme court to act as judges of the court of appeals. Upon the assignment of a court of appeals judge or a district court judge to act as a justice of the supreme court, a judge previously acting as a justice may complete unfinished duties of that position. Any number of justices may disqualify themselves from hearing and considering a case, in which event the supreme court may assign temporarily a retired justice of the supreme court, a court of appeals judge, or a district court judge to hear and consider the case in place of each disqualified justice.

Subd. 3.Retired justices and judges.

(a) The chief justice of the supreme court may assign a retired justice of the supreme court to act as a justice of the supreme court pursuant to subdivision 2 or as a judge of any other court. The chief justice may assign a retired judge of any court to act as a judge of any court except the supreme court. The chief justice of the supreme court shall determine the pay and expenses to be received by a justice or judge acting pursuant to this paragraph.

(b) A judge who has been elected to office and who has retired as a judge in good standing and is not practicing law may also be appointed to serve as judge of any court except the supreme court. A retired judge acting under this paragraph will receive pay and expenses in the amount established by the supreme court.

Subd. 4.State court supervision.

The chief justice shall exercise general supervisory powers over the courts in the state, with powers including, but not limited to:

(a) Supervision of the courts' financial affairs, programs of continuing education for judicial and nonjudicial personnel and planning and operations research;

(b) Serving as chief representative of the court system and as liaison with other governmental agencies for the public; and

The chief justice may designate other justices or judges to assist in the performance of duties.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 49 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby, 848 N.W.2d 515 (Minn. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby, 848 N.W.2d 515 (Minn. 2014). · cites it 12× “” Minn. Stat. § 2.724 , subd. 1 (2012). District court judges interpret and apply state law, and they issue orders that have binding effect statewide.”

Amundson v. State, 714 N.W.2d 715 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 13× “The appointment order identified Judge Hopper as a “Retired Judge of the District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Minnesota” and it indicated that the appointment was made pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 2.724 , subd. 3(a), which authorizes the chief justice to…”

Rieger v. Zackoski, 321 N.W.2d 16 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 4× “NOTES [*] Retired Justice acting pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 2.724. [1] On August 15, there were a total of 14 BIR security men positioned around the raceway charged with the responsibility for maintaining security at all of the gates including the gates along the paddock road …”

State v. Murphy, 545 N.W.2d 909 (Minn. 1996). · cites it 2× “But, because many of Murphy’s victims were employees in the Ramsey County court system, the case was transferred to Hennepin County and a judge from the Fifth Judicial District was assigned to hear the case pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subd. 1 (1994). Based on the conduct…”

State v. Goodloe, 718 N.W.2d 413 (Minn. 2006). · cites it 2× “Goodloe’s final claim is that the judge who made the probable cause determination in his case was not properly assigned to the case pursuant to the retired judge assignment process outlined in Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subd. 3 (2004). Again, the record provided for our review does not…”

Clark v. Pawlenty, 755 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 2× “Gilbert, Acting Chief Justice, Lawrence R. Yetka, Bruce D.”

Parks v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 289 N.W.2d 456 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 4× “6, § 2, and Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subd. 2 (1978). [1] Minn.”

Emison v. Growe, 782 F. Supp. 427 (D. Minnesota 1992). · cites it 4× “See Minn. Stat. § 2.724 , subd. 1 (1991). [9] Throughout this litigation the Emison plaintiffs and the Benson plaintiffs, infra, have represented the interests of the Independent-Republican (IR) political party.”

Peterson v. Stafford, 490 N.W.2d 418 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 2× “6, §§ 2, 10, and Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subds. 1, 2 (1990), and the members of this court who have not exercised their right of recusal have concluded that it is not only appropriate, but necessary in fulfillment of our judicial responsibility to hear and decide this controversy.”

Rogde v. United Van Bus Delivery, 330 N.W.2d 715 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “NOTES [*] Retired Justice acting pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subd. 2 (1982). [1] The majority's statement that this matter involves employee's right to temporary total disability compensation for a period of approximately 50 weeks evidently stems from a misreading of the…”

State v. Hamilton, 289 N.W.2d 470 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 2× “6, § 2, and Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subd. 2 (1978). 1 . The broken slip-bolt lock was introduced into evidence along with a photograph of its pieces remaining on the frame and door.”

Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. W. Nat'l Ins. Co., 768 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “VI, § 2, and Minn.Stat. § 2.724, subd. 2 (2008). [1] For more authority supporting the majority rule see Conrad Brothers v.”

Show all 49 citing cases →

— Minn. Stat. § 2.724(2) — 2 cases

Wild v. St. Paul Companies, Inc., 612 F.2d 341 (8th Cir. 1979).

Thibodeau v. State of Minnesota, 419 F. Supp. 87 (D. Minnesota 1976).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.