Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 214.34 (2026)

Immunity

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Reporting immunity.

Any individual, agency, institution, facility, business, or organization is immune from civil liability or criminal prosecution for submitting a report in good faith to the program under this section or for cooperating with an investigation of a report or with staff of the program. Reports are confidential and are privileged communication.

Subd. 2.Program immunity.

Members of the participating boards and persons employed by the boards and program, program consultants, and members of advisory bodies for the program are immune from civil liability and criminal prosecution for any actions, transactions, or reports in the execution of, or relating to, their duties under sections 214.31 to 214.36.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, 895 N.W.2d 623 (Minn. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, 895 N.W.2d 623 (Minn. 2017). · cites it 2× “These are substantive immunities; they immunize participants in certain categories of activity.”

Koch Refining Co. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 504 F. Supp. 593 (D. Minnesota 1980). · cites it 11× “4 The context of § 214.34 does not transform the permissive words of the regulation into a mandatory duty to reclassify based on the access standards used for initial designations.”

Koch Refining Co. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 497 F. Supp. 879 (D. Minnesota 1980). · cites it 5× “33 or the criteria for initial designation contained therein.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.