Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 220.09 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1965 c 45 s 73]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1949–1957 · leading case: Minneapolis Street Ry. Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 40 N.W.2d 353 (Minn. 1949).
Minneapolis Street Ry. Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 40 N.W.2d 353 (Minn. 1949). “09 and 220.10. The act is a remedial measure and should be liberally construed to effect its purpose of making available to all municipal street railway systems coming under its scope the advantages of both commission and local control.”
Minneapolis Street Ry. Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 52 N.W.2d 120 (Minn. 1952). “09,” and we also said that the specific terms of § 220.09 became paramount in defining and limiting the nature and scope of such regulatory power.”
City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Ry. Co., 82 N.W.2d 369 (Minn. 1957). “07 of the Brooks-Coleman Act the street railway has an indeterminate permit to operate a public street transportation system, its right of exclusive user of the tunnel route, pursuant to § 220.09, is subject to modification, or even termination, if the city council by ordinance…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.