Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 221.08 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked July 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, Ex1957 c 17 s 31]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1949–1973 · leading case: Paulson v. Schirmer Transp. Co., 81 N.W.2d 875 (Minn. 1957).
Paulson v. Schirmer Transp. Co., 81 N.W.2d 875 (Minn. 1957). “The district court concluded that the commission applied an erroneous rule of law which, in effect, required the applicant to prove public convenience and necessity as required by the Common Carrier Act, § 221.08, rather than the less restrictive rule applicable to petroleum…”
Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc., 58 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 1953). “170; (3) that the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the commission’s findings of convenience and necessity; and (4) that all factors prescribed by § 221.08 in determining whether a certificate of public convenience and necessity should be granted were taken into…”
In Re Application of Paulson, 249 Minn. 236 (Minn. 1957). “The district court concluded that the commission applied an erroneous rule of law which, in effect, required the applicant to prove public convenience and necessity as required by the Common Carrier Act, § 221.08, rather than the less restrictive rule applicable to petroleum…”
Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc., 40 N.W.2d 896 (Minn. 1949). “Thereunder, it is required to consider the interests of the public rather than those of either party; whether present transportation service is adequate; whether the proposed service is likely to be permanent; and the effect of such service upon present service, existing travel…”
Twin City Motor Bus Co. v. Rechtzigel, 38 N.W.2d 825 (Minn. 1949). “08, in issuing such order the commission gave reasonable consideration to the interests of the public to the transportation service furnished by the respondent; to the effect its order might have thereon; to the likelihood of the pro *205 posed service being permanent and…”
State ex rel. Raymond Bros. Motor Transp. Co. v. R.R. & Warehouse Comm'n, 52 N.W.2d 769 (Minn. 1952). “Section 221.08 provides: “* * * The commission may issue the certificate as prayed for, or issue it for the partial exercise only of the privilege sought; and may attach to the exercise of the rights granted by such certificate, such terms and conditions as, in its judgment, the…”
State, Dep't of Nat. Resources ex rel. Herbst v. Dist. Court, 208 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 1973). “1953, § 221.08. Similarly, City of Rochester v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.