Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 241.13 (2026)
Contingent Account; Damage Deposits; Correctional Institutions
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§
Subdivision 1.Contingent account.
The commissioner of corrections may permit a contingent account to remain in the hands of the accounting officer of any such institution from which expenditures may be made in case of actual emergency requiring immediate payment to prevent loss or danger to the institution or its inmates and for the purpose of paying freight, purchasing produce, livestock and other commodities requiring a cash settlement, and for the purpose of discounting bills incurred, but in all cases subject to revision by the commissioner of corrections. An itemized statement of every expenditure made during the month from such account shall be submitted to the commissioner under rules established by the commissioner. If necessary, the commissioner shall make proper requisition upon the commissioner of management and budget for a payment to secure the contingent account for each institution.
§
Subd. 2.Damage deposits.
The commissioner of corrections shall collect a damage deposit from all staff who reside in housing on the grounds of the Thistledew Corrections Camp at Togo, Minnesota and deposit the moneys in a savings account in a bank at interest. Withdrawals therefrom may be made to defray the cost of any damage to the residence caused by the tenant or to return the deposit to the tenant with accrued interest if the residence is vacated without damage. The commissioner shall keep accurate records in the name of each tenant so that the interest may be credited to the proper account.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: Bah v. Cangemi, 489 F. Supp. 2d 905 (D. Minn. 2007).
Bah v. Cangemi, 489 F. Supp. 2d 905 (D. Minn. 2007). “Section 241.13(h) of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations provides for subjecting aliens who are released from custody under Zadvydas to appropriate release conditions.”
Yang, No. 0:26-cv-01700 (D. Minn. Mar. 17, 2026). “Courts have repeatedly held that a petitioner’s challenge to the government’s failure to comply with the requirements in § 241.13 is appropriately raised in a habeas proceeding, and Courts have also repeatedly concluded that such failures are indeed a proper basis for habeas…”
Nuur, No. 0:25-cv-04641 (D. Minn. Jan. 6, 2026). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Faysal N.”
Shae v. Mchenry, 806 F. Supp. 3d 894 (D. Minn. 2025). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Petitioner and grants the Petition on this basis.”
Archilla v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-02144 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “Section 241.13 applies “where the alien has provided good reason to believe there is no significant likelihood of removal to the country to which he or she was ordered removed, or to a third country, in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Gibson, No. 0:26-cv-00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 17, 2026). “Under the latter, ICE “may revoke [a noncitizen’s] release under this section and return the [noncitizen] to custody if, on account of changed circumstances, [ICE] determines that there is a significant likelihood that the [noncitizen] may be removed in the reasonably…”
Berchie v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-03197 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “2023) (citing § 241.13(i)(2)). ICE should make the determination to re-detain based on the following factors: [T]he history of the [noncitizen’s] efforts to comply with the order of removal, the history of [ICE’s] efforts to remove [noncitizens] to the country in question or to…”
Ahmadi, No. 0:26-cv-01585 (D. Minn. Mar. 2, 2026). “4 (l) and § 241.13(i), ostensibly to allow Petitioner “an opportunity to respond to the reasons for revocation of his .”
Roble v. Bondi, 803 F. Supp. 3d 766 (D. Minn. 2025). “§ 241.13(i)(3). At that interview, the noncitizen “may submit any evidence or information that he or she believes shows there is no significant likelihood he or she be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Thao, No. 0:26-cv-01432 (D. Minn. Feb. 20, 2026). “) Under § 241.13, “it is the government’s burden to show a change in circumstance before revoking an order of supervision and detaining a person indefinitely.”
Sanogo, No. 0:26-cv-01408 (D. Minn. Feb. 24, 2026). “Under § 241.13, “it is the government’s burden to show a change in circumstance before revoking an order of supervision and detaining a person indefinitely.”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(f): 4 cases
Shae v. Mchenry, 806 F. Supp. 3d 894 (D. Minn. 2025). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Petitioner and grants the Petition on this basis.”
Archilla v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-02144 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “Section 241.13 applies “where the alien has provided good reason to believe there is no significant likelihood of removal to the country to which he or she was ordered removed, or to a third country, in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Nuur, No. 0:25-cv-04641 (D. Minn. Jan. 6, 2026). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Faysal N.”
Gibson, No. 0:26-cv-00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 17, 2026). “Under the latter, ICE “may revoke [a noncitizen’s] release under this section and return the [noncitizen] to custody if, on account of changed circumstances, [ICE] determines that there is a significant likelihood that the [noncitizen] may be removed in the reasonably…”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(g): 3 cases
Shae v. Mchenry, 806 F. Supp. 3d 894 (D. Minn. 2025). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Petitioner and grants the Petition on this basis.”
Nuur, No. 0:25-cv-04641 (D. Minn. Jan. 6, 2026). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Faysal N.”
Gibson, No. 0:26-cv-00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 17, 2026). “Under the latter, ICE “may revoke [a noncitizen’s] release under this section and return the [noncitizen] to custody if, on account of changed circumstances, [ICE] determines that there is a significant likelihood that the [noncitizen] may be removed in the reasonably…”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(h): 1 case
Bah v. Cangemi, 489 F. Supp. 2d 905 (D. Minn. 2007). “Section 241.13(h) of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations provides for subjecting aliens who are released from custody under Zadvydas to appropriate release conditions.”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(i): 5 cases
Yang, No. 0:26-cv-01700 (D. Minn. Mar. 17, 2026). “Courts have repeatedly held that a petitioner’s challenge to the government’s failure to comply with the requirements in § 241.13 is appropriately raised in a habeas proceeding, and Courts have also repeatedly concluded that such failures are indeed a proper basis for habeas…”
Nuur, No. 0:25-cv-04641 (D. Minn. Jan. 6, 2026). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Faysal N.”
Archilla v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-02144 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “Section 241.13 applies “where the alien has provided good reason to believe there is no significant likelihood of removal to the country to which he or she was ordered removed, or to a third country, in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Gibson, No. 0:26-cv-00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 17, 2026). “Under the latter, ICE “may revoke [a noncitizen’s] release under this section and return the [noncitizen] to custody if, on account of changed circumstances, [ICE] determines that there is a significant likelihood that the [noncitizen] may be removed in the reasonably…”
Ahmadi, No. 0:26-cv-01585 (D. Minn. Mar. 2, 2026). “4 (l) and § 241.13(i), ostensibly to allow Petitioner “an opportunity to respond to the reasons for revocation of his .”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(i)(1): 1 case
Archilla v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-02144 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “Section 241.13 applies “where the alien has provided good reason to believe there is no significant likelihood of removal to the country to which he or she was ordered removed, or to a third country, in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(i)(2): 5 cases
Shae v. Mchenry, 806 F. Supp. 3d 894 (D. Minn. 2025). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Petitioner and grants the Petition on this basis.”
Archilla v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-02144 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “Section 241.13 applies “where the alien has provided good reason to believe there is no significant likelihood of removal to the country to which he or she was ordered removed, or to a third country, in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Berchie v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-03197 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “2023) (citing § 241.13(i)(2)). ICE should make the determination to re-detain based on the following factors: [T]he history of the [noncitizen’s] efforts to comply with the order of removal, the history of [ICE’s] efforts to remove [noncitizens] to the country in question or to…”
Nuur, No. 0:25-cv-04641 (D. Minn. Jan. 6, 2026). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Faysal N.”
Gibson, No. 0:26-cv-00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 17, 2026). “Under the latter, ICE “may revoke [a noncitizen’s] release under this section and return the [noncitizen] to custody if, on account of changed circumstances, [ICE] determines that there is a significant likelihood that the [noncitizen] may be removed in the reasonably…”
Minn. Stat. § 241.13(i)(3): 7 cases
Archilla v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-02144 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “Section 241.13 applies “where the alien has provided good reason to believe there is no significant likelihood of removal to the country to which he or she was ordered removed, or to a third country, in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Yang, No. 0:26-cv-01700 (D. Minn. Mar. 17, 2026). “Courts have repeatedly held that a petitioner’s challenge to the government’s failure to comply with the requirements in § 241.13 is appropriately raised in a habeas proceeding, and Courts have also repeatedly concluded that such failures are indeed a proper basis for habeas…”
Roble v. Bondi, 803 F. Supp. 3d 766 (D. Minn. 2025). “§ 241.13(i)(3). At that interview, the noncitizen “may submit any evidence or information that he or she believes shows there is no significant likelihood he or she be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Berchie v. Bondi, No. 0:25-cv-03197 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 2025). “2023) (citing § 241.13(i)(2)). ICE should make the determination to re-detain based on the following factors: [T]he history of the [noncitizen’s] efforts to comply with the order of removal, the history of [ICE’s] efforts to remove [noncitizens] to the country in question or to…”
Shae v. Mchenry, 806 F. Supp. 3d 894 (D. Minn. 2025). “) Given the limited response from Respondents concerning changed circumstances and compliance with the requisite procedures at section 241.13, the Court agrees with Petitioner and grants the Petition on this basis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.