Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 242.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1977 c 392 s 14]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1971–1980 · leading case: Clemmons v. State, 321 So. 2d 238 (Ala. 1975).
Clemmons v. State, 321 So. 2d 238 (Ala. 1975). “1971); Minn.Stat.Ann., § 242.01 et seq., (Supp.1971); Wis.”
State v. Siirila, 193 N.W.2d 467 (Minn. 1971). “" The whole purpose of the Youth Conservation Act is expressed in § 242.01, as follows: "The purpose of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 242, is to protect society more effectively by providing a program looking toward prevention of delinquency and crime by educating the youth of the…”
Welfare of J. E. C. v. State, 225 N.W.2d 245 (Minn. 1975). “32, which provide in relevant part: § 242.01: “The purpose of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 242, is to protect society more effectively by providing a program looking toward prevention of delinquency and crime by educating the youth of the state against crime and by substituting…”
Tucker v. State, 295 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1980). “” Minn.Stat. § 242.01 *511 (1976). Although Tucker has committed a heinous crime, the MCB and the district court cannot disqualify Tucker from the possibility of release under provisions of the act when the legislature has specifically determined which types of youth offenders…”
Rongitsch v. State, 289 N.W.2d 413 (Minn. 1979). “1976, § 242.01. Contrary to the conclusion of the district court, we conclude that the transfer statute does not authorize a transfer if the youthful offender was under 21 at the time he committed the felony while on parole from the YCC.”
State ex rel. Polk v. Tahash, 186 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. 1971). “27, provides in part: “Unless previously discharged under the provisions of sections 242.01 to 242.38, a person who has been committed to the commission upon conviction of a crime shall be discharged by the director and be given his liberty on his twenty-fifth birthday, unless…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.